Member Info for Rumandpoker

Very funny, bladey.

I was just thinking myself actually, the noticeable absence of the deramping crew during this current lull in proceedings really speaks volumes about the prospects here.

I would also like to throw my weight behind the sentiment of AG and RPtard. Although, mining stocks are not my expertise by any chalk i am very happy to be part of this stock long term. Not many stocks you can be confident where they will be in 12 months, but this is one

I noticed that too, Tony. However, at that time on that day (RNS day) that was a sell. Which, I think, sheds light on the somewhat baffling course of events that day - with such a small float, and with a large proportion of those in sticky hands, that immediately would've sent SP into NT for a period of time. Which is what happened. Being in NT to sell would've stifled buying and spooked some pi's into selling . So unfortunately that trade on such a small float would seem to have ruined it for the rest of us.

It's gone down as people collect profits from the sky high rises last week, what did you expect? Particularly as the RSI was sky high, but now it's under control.

You make me laugh, Tony, haha. Always fun reading your messages

Notice how the spread has become much narrower today - none of the 8% malarkey of the last few weeks -, so clearly the MM's are happy with the level of tlrisk now. Probably dually because of the surge in gold price and the likely strength of the incoming MRE, but great to see nonetheless.

My understanding is it's a transfer of shares between individuals/entities, though that needs clarifying from others.

At least buys outstripped sells in the afternoon, so some hope we can reverse momentum before news.

Personally, I won't engage him in a conversation, not least because all his answers are pre-conceived, but I happy to highlight the pattern in his posts. Not that I intend to carry on.

A good day and yet again the two chuckle brothers trash talking, not even one iota of excitement. I think you need a bigger bin, guys.

My take on it is that although it may reduce the allure of BTC to those operating in the shadows it will increase the allure to institutions (hedge funds and conglomerates) as a function of the increased legitimacy and somewhat reduced risk of regulatory action directly against crypto - at least from the perspective of tackling criminal proceeds. To me, that bodes well for the future of BTC.

If you can recognise the risks then you can also recognise the positives, so why aren't your posts balanced between positive and negative?

Why don't u two start a discussion on how the space race or the colour of toothbrush used this morning will mess up BTC mining.

I'll even start it for u -
I used a purple toothbrush this morning by accident; Not good for arb prospects, be careful fellow ABR investors...sorry, I mean arb.

I'm pretty confident in saying chaebol is a trader and his posts are purely an attempt to feed volatility. At least he's not too popular

HarChri, your name was mentioned in a report by London southeast (I don't read them, but saw the tag) in a list of top 5 most valued posters; I'm guessing based on the number of likes.

Fwiw, I also find it extremely tiring reading posts by those that continuosly negative (and vice versa. To my mind, when someone paints a particular narrative post after post that person clearly has an agenda and isn't worth reading and that applies to the continuous tampers too. I'd say there about ten posters on here that you can count on .

True, but there are also plenty of positives ahead for this company, which, without naming names, some posters ignore or constantly attempt to find a negative in. So only discussing the negative, never the positive.

I'm not naming names, I just choose to skip those person's posts. I know who to trust on for balanced opinions.

Yep. Notice how it opened at 125, same as closing price yesterday, meaning no funds/HNW individuals sold in the pre-opening auction. Which shows you how idiotic the initial post in this thread is.

Haha, I like it Macf1. Certainly possible it was orchestrated publicity, in a way that Max Clifford and Katie Price would've been proud of. Pretty effective regardless.

The information is what is important to investors, not the way it comes out. If I invent a cure for the common cold but let it slip over a boozy lunch I would still be a millionaire; not penniless.

Take a look at who the posters are and their posting history. Positive stuff.