Member Info for RichTheNewbie

Rosewall - good trading but potentially difficult. It's always more difficult to know what you're gambling when you don't entirely believe in the underlying data the company put out. If it's all based on hot air then trying to pick a meaningful valuation, and in turn a floor/ceiling, after factoring other factors like fear/hype, impending placing, etc, then it all becomes a bit pot luck and gambling on spikes/falls continuing for a bit or rebounding. Many times one could have been forgiven for thinking the UKOG hype bubble would have burst and still it went back up.....although like the boy who cries wolf.....I think many are becoming wise to it (well more anyway).

Rosewall - You can view it without signing up (if you wanted to). Just some rather direct questions from the Times energy editor to him (unanswered)

https://twitter.com/emilygosden/status/1004293367201779712 (funnily enough the old aussie hype-merchant didn't reply!)

Lol - probably Rosewall. Did you see the tweet from The Times journalist to old Lemongas a couple of days ago?

Not2sure - I agree with you. I think there's a lot of unsavoury people on here. This means CH gets it in the neck unjustifiably a lot of the time. It means they'll call me and anothers names for having a differing view at the moment. They probably spend the other half of their time shouting at traffic when they're not on here.

westie50 - unlike clowns like you I'm not saying it's definitely going to be X price. This is because we don't know what's going to happen. If they get the permit, get decent bids/offers of funding, PG11a starts working, then you might do well. If you don't then you probably won't. Of course you could ignore the possibility that things don't go as you hope and pick your price targets accordingly but that's for you and the brainless crew who can't consider more than one eventuality!

Not2sure - considering I've defended CH, far more than most people on here, when he's being criticised for things that are outside of his control, I find that a strange thing to say to me! I'm not even being particularly critical of him today (it's just a typical AIM RNS). westie50 - I'm not saying this definitely can't/won't go to 1.5p/2+ so I most certainly won't be wrong if it does. I've stated thousands of times I think theres still some chance this will do fine. However there's a good chance it won't too.

I've lost count of the amount of times someone's said that Monarch. They've always been wrong.

I find it funny when people talk about an agenda. Or moan about paid posters. And numerous other silly accusations. The simple fact is there's one main group with a very obvious agenda. It's the people making these accusations, desperately trying to ramp the stock they own, for their own financial gain, and attacking anyone else who doesn't go along with it. I'm not long or short in this, do not make money in any way from it going up or down, and am impartial, unlike the rafts of you desperate people ramping in groups and backing each other up.

it=the separator

Typical old AIM. Bad news with the permit having yet more delays (will they ever get it?), and PG10 declining, sugar coated with PG11a restarting.......but no indications of whether they've noticed it making any difference since turning it on (unless they wrote the RNS the moment it was....which I doubt). Someone posted on Twitter the other day that if an AIM company announced it was going bust it would start with the words "we are pleased to announce"!

radwak - I'm not sure the AGM is particularly meaningful personally (unless some of the resolutions got voted down - which I'm guessing they won't but impossible to call). They might try to appease people at it by throwing out some hopeful/optimistic statements, that people get over-excited unjustifiably, but I wouldn't expect much bar that. Very hard to call, I once went to a presentation by a company, fully expecting to either hold or buy more, and ended up selling the lot, as they got pressed on questions and I really didn't like the answers (turned out to be a very good move). So it's impossible to predict the effect of the AGM without knowing what they might say! As for the movement before then.....it's little more than a working week to go.....so odds on it'll stick between this 0.85p-1.05p range. However, I would never rule out dips/spikes either way on a volatile PI held stock like this, the MMs can move it up and down to generate trading, when it goes quiet.

Funny as one of them wasn't telling you to hold off buying. Funnily enough only reso and me suggested it was more likely to go down.

(well trades are coming through sporadically at least)

It's now trading.

Lol......wonder how many of them will get the joke. Pretty certain most of them won't find it funny if they do ;)

JJ was banned. TPT posted yesterday.

You can't really play hardball against someone who holds all the cards. They could just simply find a reason to revoke the licence or tie them up in red tape and then not renew the licence before AST ever extract any meaningful amount of gas. You can ask nicely, and make your case as best you can, trying to highlight the benefits for them, and that's it. Anything else is likely to go very badly for you. They're doing that and there's nothing more they can do.

BigBear - they use PI money to fund all the development, take all the risk, and if it happens to go well they profit from it. Of course they're supportive ;) PS - in that interview he said no Slovenian companies were interested so it sounds like nothings changed.

Ah - folding. Lol. Yeah, that shouldn't happen, although weirdly that Slovenian interview CH seemed to say they'd shut up shop if they didn't get the IPPC (not sure that can be right and perhaps language barrier). Major dilution would be the biggest worry, rather than folding outright, if they didn't get any bids.