Member Info for Reaper007

14.07 14.18 - I think some earlier posts by our respected female cohort summed up this poster very accurately. Just how insensitive are these new posts in respect of aspiring investors who have strived to gain a position here? Very disappointing and
investment advice so often given by this poster is always fatally flawed. On the slightly plus side poster has increased number of readable scripts and if this is due to personal endeavour then BRAVO!! :-)) VGLA

21.08 - for those following this there is a much much better brief insight is at 21.57. Thank you BB32, as ever. VGLA

21.08 - not likely if you actually read the data. VGLA

16.43 - ditto :-)) VGLA

22.57 - Daveoilfriday: largely agree. Well put. VGLA

00.10: maybe. However, there would be very many evaluative hoops to jump through to get there. Happy with the real outcomes on our leases. VGLA

22.16 - Daveoilfriday: it was originally against LSE posting rules to do that. If still the case then there might be unintended consequential suspensions. Good posts from you in last few days and very good luck to you in this :-) VGLA

12.18 - post seems to be written in two halves; first half unintelligible and second half: indulging in public abuse by humiliation; individual victimisation; repetition of attacks which have been perpetrated over some years; all openly to foist some investment approach on readers of this bb (the latter portion of post in very different, coherent prose). Reprehensible imo. VGLA

20.27: Seven targets?? DYOR :-)) VGLA

is likely to be very soon. VGLA

14.47 - you might need to read 'chartman' and then go back one :-) VGLA

'cancel'(?) or 'CANCEL'[[??]] - sounds loud and distorted when it's old news! VGLA

13.24 - Proselenes: terrific find, thank you. VGLA

13.32 - and poster does not say! VGLA

22.11 - best viewed in context of posting history. VGLA

Well, unless there is a really serious problem we are due inevitable 'release of news'. It is called 'February' :-)) VGLA

22.41 - not quite there; just a little extra push needed? VGLA

12.01 - Smiler: what a lovely surprise. Just in time for the fun (and games). Explains re another place. I don't do SP here but leave that to the genuine gurus and invokers of arcane practices. All very best of luck to you in this :-)) VGLA

09.08 - Brom: thank you. Reads like plenty of wriggle room but..... VGLA

01.26 - V111JAS: Good morning. It will be a useful measure of intent and confidence. I assume the final permit will refer to a total permitted depth (? Brom) and that could well be the end of it. However, let's see if we get 'wriggle room' :-) VGLA