We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Fact check: TM1 is main market not AIM.
TM1 is main market and not on AIM.
Seems to be no mention of BZT on the Sunday Roast CB special. It's definitely not shown in the ticker list. I'm not here to provide a full critical appraisal of the roast format (most know what it is and isn't), however I'm concerned that BZT wasn't given a mention upfront. This is especially true as CB seems to use the roast as his primary broadcast comms. I've not listened right the way through, maybe Bezant gets a walk on part towards the end.
Nice results and positivity today. serendipitous that this episode of Mining Stock Education was just published on 'nuggety gold.' hope it's useful to some folks.
ATB and positivity for your investments
https://www.miningstockeducation.com/2022/06/what-investors-need-to-know-about-the-nugget-effect-in-gold-deposits-with-dr-rob-stevens-ph-d/
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc3ByZWFrZXIuY29tL3Nob3cvMzAxNTQ5OS9lcGlzb2Rlcy9mZWVk/episode/dGFnOnNvdW5kY2xvdWQsMjAxMDp0cmFja3MvMTI4MzQ3MDkxOA?ep=14
Agronmocis mentioned but focus of podcast is 3D Bio Tissues. Not sure if link will work but it's Sunday Roast podcast, easy to find.
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hdWRpb2Jvb20uY29tL2NoYW5uZWxzLzUwNjQ0MzcucnNz/episode/dGFnOmF1ZGlvYm9vbS5jb20sMjAyMi0wNS0xNDovcG9zdHMvODA4MzczMw?ep=14
I concur - andmillsy and prickly very informative posts. Thank you for sharing.
Sparky. Are you channelling the spirit of Murray Walker?
Mr T. True, true and await we do. That said, is there something inherent in the licence renewal stopping CB/Bezant promoting the higher figures used by ACI? I recognise the intention to upgrade the resource has been mentioned, what I'm not understanding is why the larger numbers are not being used by Bezant.
ATB BZT QB
I'm interested in why there's no discussion regarding CB/Bezant quoting Mankayan(JORC 2004) at approx half the metals of Asean Copper Investments. If you don't know what I'm talking about see ACI's aus linkedin page where they state a JORC 2012. So does anyone have any thoughts on this? What am I missing... Seems a big upside to me?
Hi DVH - stop by Asean Coppers linkedIn page... They are already quoting a JORC 2012... what do you make of that?
3rd time lucky...
queerBongo
Mt* jee-wiz! Definitely DYOR...
Sorry should be 2.8 Moz Cu* . CB also talks roughly half amount if Au as stated by Asean.
Interesting CB is talking 1.4mt Cu in that interview whereas Asean are stating JORC 2021 2.4 mt Cu, 9.7 Moz Au & 20 Moz Ag for Mankayan. Any thoughts?
https://au.linkedin.com/company/asean-copper-investments?trk=public_profile_experience-item_profile-section-card_image-click
David is a director and acting CEO of Asean Copper that owns 100% interest in the Mankayan Copper and Gold Porphyry Project in the Philippines. The project has a JORC2012 of 9.7M oz gold and 2.8Mt copper.
Last numbers from Bezant on 13th Sept 2021:
The Company has previously reported a JORC 2004 resource using a 0.4% Cu cut off of 1.3 Mt of contained copper and 4.3 M oz of gold for the Mankayan Project and it is the intention of IDM to update this to a JORC 2012 compliant resource.
Needless to say I prefer David's version and was there a Bezant update on this...?
Bitcoin - Surely not (?_?)! And likewise - enjoy the weekend!
Legal/Tamer et all - would an NDA on a JV trump the AIM rules for the Creswick assays? I can understand the details of the JV not requiring disclosure until signed but can the results of the assays be kept from the market because of an NDA?
With regards to Creswick assays - 1. pure delay.
(Am I correct in believing in-house readings, assays and interpretations don't have to be released 'without delay' as not independently verified?)
Therefore with regards to bigger strategies around Creswick... the game's a foot.
Have fun all...
Legal/Bitcoin. I do enjoy your posts and they often provide some useful scenarios to consider. It's worth considering under what conditions a company can keep the lid on a pot of information... be interested to see how that impacts the scenarios
AIM Rules for companies.
--
11. An AIM company must issue notification without delay of any new developments which
are not public knowledge which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a significant
movement in the price of its AIM securities. By way of example, this may include matters
concerning a change in:
— its financial condition;
— its sphere of activity;
— the performance of its business; or
— its expectation of its performance
I'll leave you to hypothesise...
I accepted on the 17th Dec and I'm still waiting for the cash and the Zinnwald distribution to show in my account. For this company I used Fineco. I have spoken to Fineco and they tell me they are waiting on Bacanora. Whoever is at fault, it is over the stated timescales and i'm concerned as everyone seems to have the Zinnwald distribution at least. I've found Fineco a good platform up until this point but their communications on this matter have been poor.
SteveY1 Thank you for your reply. I was confused on two fronts:
1. Why it was sent to me yesterday. (I await broker reply)
2. Why it said 'part not satisfied' (i.e. new language)
Your answer helps with second part.
ATB
queerBongo
Hello bulletin board: investors, traders, trolls and spies. I've received this message in my trading account yesterday 14th December. Given the lack of discussion and SP movement I'm assuming it's not news. However the mention of 'part' of the MACC is distinct to the original RNS notice from Oct. I've been looking through the threads and RNS to confirm/make sense. Anyone else had this? Any thoughts on what it means? 'We wish to inform you that the company GANGFENG INTERNATIONAL TRADING (SHANGHAI) LTD announces that the approval from part of the Mexican Antitrust Authorities (the Mexican Antitrust Clearance Condition) was not satisfied. The offering term will remain open until the conditions are met.'
CB - the most popular initials in mining?