George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
I think they simply don't know about us, so here we languish, still below the price prior to the NYSE listing. It has been very quiet, so I do hope Bogart/Molot are rectifying this flop behind the scenes.
Very pleased with the bounce. Chart now looking better. Bring on £10 for starters.
This needs to bounce hard from this region just above £6. Otherwise the chart start to look a bit worrisome. But the price since the dual listing seems to have detached from any normality. Utter mess.
Feels like we've made what we intended to be the grand entrance at that very American thing; the debs prom ... But we're still wearing the same old dress we always wore and forgot to invite a date or tell anyone we're coming .. so hardly anyone has noticed we're there.
Yes ok,5-10% is probably a bit of a one off due to a spike in demand following the us listing day causing an MM imbalance which then corrected itself in the other direction.
Yeah, the us listing is hardly making Burford more investable when you can lose 5-10% from the outset, just from"slack" between the two exchanges.
It is disappointing, and surprising, that the price is now below the point at which it was dual listed.
If the broker didn't make an effort to contact you, preferably by snailmail, I'd say they were remiss in their duties and it's their job to get your shares onto some sort of trading platform, and liquidate them for you if that's what you want. NYSE less of a problem than orphan non Crest AIM shares, but I'd put the ball in their court.
Still untradeable on HSBC. Useless. AJBell were fine yesterday.
A letter from HSBC seems to imply that I can ask them to convert the new AIM DI shares into NYSE after Monday if I want.
HSBC confirmed to me my shares will be"claimed in CREST, as a mandatory event" whatever that means!
And another from me - will MMs in the US be buying up the AIM DIs and converting them to NYSE stock, to provide liquidity for US trading? So liquidity and pricing will be more or less the same, both sides of the pond?
So it's not just me being blanked by HSBC.
"they said as they already use CREST, it is likely they will keep using it." This is what concerns me a bit - that the brokers will neglect what we ask them to do - To actively elect to stay on crest. We know they already trade on crest, but that will cease unless the brokers apply to stay. Last thing I want is to end up with a tonne of AIM stock, with no trading platform, because the broker forgot, or thought they didn't need to select crest.
It's roughly inline with my expectations. No idea what the market expectations were, but I think they were low after H2 19, so expecting a small rise (after the usual shenanigans. Covid slowed business quite considerably though.
I wonder if the bid/offer spread/ liquidity will become unattractive on AIM after the US listing. Against that is the currency costs of liquidating a NYSE stock, assuming my broker can do DTC (I think they can).
The fincen files have long been in the possession of the authorities, haven't they? It's just now they've leaked into the public domain.
To allay your worry vpolyzos, I'll give you 5.20 right now for all your holding before tomorrow's open. Can't say fairer than that!
Looks to me like she's just saying she hasn't considered every point of Argentina's application, which is required to avoid looking like it's dismissed out of hand, and reducing grounds to appeal.
Same old same old daily pattern. I'm sure money could be made from it, but it's really getting boring.