Member Info for Pecten11

Don't ask silly questions like that Garibaldi, surely you don't expect that VAST would put useful information like that on the Ops page of their own website where investors may actually find it??

If they did, we might be churlish enough to hold them to it...

Keep saying it Joe, you might be right one of these days ...... lol

Academy, HZM have today , also announced a broker change away from Numis (albeit less dramatic wording than SAVEs)
So the move away from natural resources brings true - maybe they've lost that analytical skill set?

Numis have just resigned as joint broker for GGP citing same reason

Trek, yeah first reaction not good, however, trying to find a silver lining, could some of the sales action we've seen be Numis clients holdings transferring to another broker (Mirabaud)??

What differentiates an 'intelligent' guess from than a 'stupid' one ??

Confirmation bias maybe

Sandy/yrabs - almost certainly- iirc VASTs SP at the time SVS went into suspension/insolvency was around .13, so it would be no surprise if locked in holders try to realise some cash

Gkb, to be fair AP has verbally stated in interviews Mercuria are still going to be offtaker , but we have no details on what type, grade or price basis that deal is structured

Zeps, I don't look in here as often as I used to, so just seen your terrible news.
My heartfelt condolences to you and your family - while you stay strong for your family, don't forget to ask for help and support for yourself

If you sold the trade at 9.18 for 500000 shares. Ouch

I normally think posts like this on other boards are BS - but does anyone else feel that the small sells at the bottom of the spread are timed to stymie any hint of a momentum change in the SP?
Feels very deliberate

Changedman, I'm not a fan of Nickel either, but if you're gonna criticise someone else's posts, at least try to get your facts straight -if Nickel posted at 12.49 on EUA (it must have been deleted) , the SP graph suggests the price was 18.25,it now 17.50 so not sure where your imaginary 35% rise comes from??

Or are you just trying to cross promote other stock on the VAST board??

Either way - sad

https://www.investegate.co.uk/hurricane-energy-plc--hur-/rns/operational-and-corporate-update/202007080700043204S/

Redleader, at least I can understand that!

Just to balance some nutter who is posting across multiple boards

'Following its reclassification as an AIM Rule 15 cash shell in January 2020, the Company is required to make an acquisition which constitutes a reverse takeover under the AIM Rules by 28 July 2020, failing which the Company's ordinary shares would be suspended from trading on AIM pursuant to AIM Rule 40. The Company's admission to trading on AIM would then be cancelled six months from the date of suspension, should the reason for the suspension not have been rectified.'

Big bear it would have been far harder for Dr T to put a hedge in place considering it was early in the production profile (some may say it still is early), it could have been massively costly by not being able to acheive the target volume (especially with oil price pre Covid)
Hindsight is easy

Well if you 'reckon' oil will keep going up, then what more evidence do the BoD need?? Lol

Oil forecast going up daft - forecast, not fact

Cost, yes. Prudent, yes considering international Covid figures are still increasing rapidly, suggesting future instability is likely

Squirrel as you seem to have as close as a direct line yo AP as anyone, can you ask him what price we will get paid by Mercuria per tonne of Cu concentrate (at approx 20%)?

Sarah, as far as I'm aware the details of the offtake aggreement with Mercuria aren't in the public domain, so whether its fixed Cu price, a % of the spot price is unknown and remember as VAST will be selling a concentrate, not copper cathode, then well only get a % anyway.

Does anyone know better for fact??