RE: Extreme bargain30 Mar 2026 10:32
<<Because the normal Valkyrie was way too complex and costed actually more to build and final development then they were sold for. >> Would you mind to share the proof for that, please? The FY results do not even hint at that.<<They would never have done that after Stroll took over because of that, >>That is an assumption in hindsight, right?<<but they couldn't stop it as they would have lawsuits all over the place. >>Lawsuits like with Valhalla and Nebula?<<The Valhalla is completely different, much less complex and uses the same base as the Valkyrie >> So same but different? Not convinced either here by regarding technical contents. <<so not a huge development cost.>> No, they had to adopt a new EE-architecture. The engine of AMG in Valhalla was a bit less costly to produce but that does not make their day. As big hands like Cosworth not really involved here the Valhalla was overdue by years and that is rather not costsaving. Scale-efects are not expected but cost-jumps from ultra-low to mid-volume. <<So>> not so <<high profit, just like some of the other specials, like Valour etc. Only the Valhalla is in much bigger volume.. Nice fake account btw.>>That hysterical account discussion is tiring as much as posting repeatedly un-proven claims.