Very strange stance from the BBC and the FT16 Aug 2025 12:34
Both of these news organisations have come straight out with 'meeting ends with no deal'.
It was never going to be about making a deal. These things always happen in stages, so just seeing if Putin would even get on a plane and leave his bunker was a massive step forward. If I had to put money on it, I would say it would need a minimum of about 4-8 meetings before the outline of a deal is put forward.
Second point is them saying Trump was too nice. I have negotiated deals for FTSE 100 companies, you are looking for an outcome for your business, you leave your opinions at the door, it's the art of the deal. The second you are hostile to the other side, they will walk and never come back, which means endless casualties on both sides (which goes against the intended purpose of the meeting).
It's the bits you miss that point to a major step forward, Putin inviting Trump to Russia shows that at least it didn't end in failure, they want a peace deal, Putin didn't immediately walk away from the discussions.
BBC saying they believe Putin was the winner and smiling etc, good, because I always wanted my opposite to think they had won, every time.