Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Sorry to say I'm still here Makeabundle.
Feel free to bin me as you obviously need the same confirmation bias that so many here seek.
Having a different opinion to yours doesn't mean I have been disingenuous but if that is your opinion then so be it.
Hi Del,
I think there are more specific questions that can be put.
Are the potential buyers who did DD 792 days ago still at the table.
Are either the Russian or HK potential counterparties new to the table, have either done DD.
The DFS is a highly important study that puts value on the MT project and as such should be released to shareholders due to listing regulations, why are they witholding this information as they are with drilling results.
Can they confirm if the concentrate is the whole production from WK or EUA's 68% share. My take is it's all the 2022 production.
Is the £1.65m of provisions made in relation to the mineral extraction tax now available as funds for EUA going forward.
Was going to post to say another thread bites the dust.
Doubt it's censors/mediators, threads keep being removed with nothing in them that seems to warrant it, almost as if someone has influence to get stuff removed they don't agree with.
Hi Trowtech,
Not suggesting you could be bothered but my posting history shows I used to discuss a lot with Rowka and that I didn't subscribe in any way to his £3.50 or anywhere close. My history has me saying when I was selling. I have always said there is potential in the MT area but a lot needs proving up. Started posting again more recently as this company is intriguing in the expectation people have for it. Started posting initially as suddenly interest in the company increased massively having held but felt no need to post prir to that.
Never advised anyone to buy or sell or said it was worthless or worth billions. Whatever your opinion of me is you are entitled to it but got to love a conspiracy theory.
I wasn't expecting answers on the £10m odd moved to the holding company but doesn't hurt to ask.
AIM listing rule II says exploration drilling updates are required and as a minimum should include depth of the zone tested, drilling intervals and average grades. The whole point is so investors can put some sense of value on the company so I don't see how NDA's can trump listing rules.
Hi Crusherman,
Asked about the whereabouts of the drilling results from the infil and step out drilling at MT and into NKT and updating reserves and resources for MT. Also whether they were prepared to say what the £1.25m + payments into the holding company were used for.
Except I am invested, am not here every day and nothing I have posted today is about trying to be a geologist.
If you want to question anything I have posted today then go ahead, easy to verify it.
If you weren't aware of what I have posted about then why the f... are you invested here? The first thing you should do when investing in a mining company is understand how much of the assets the company you are invested in owns.
Try adding something of value for a change Richard98, attack the post not the poster.
It's also important to consider EUA owns 68% of what's at WK, 80% of what's at MT and NK(T) and 68% of (NK)T. Also some of the roughly 4500KG of Pt at WK has been mined and the Pt is raw Pt which contains around 70/75% pure Pt and other metals.
Hi mrbrian,
The 1.9Moz Pd equivalent is a historic figure from 2016, as prices of all the metals in the basket at MT move relative to each other on a daily basis the Pd equivalent figure does as well. They now claim 2Moz Pt equivalent, not sure when they changed this on the website but that figure will have changed as will the figure WAI gave. It's the problem with giving any Pd or Pt equivalent figure, I don't know why they don't just give a list of what metals there are and what amounts. Yes, it's a mixture of reserves and resources and they are witholding drill results done more recently at MT and into NKT which is a bit naughty, goes against AIM listing rules. I have raised the matter of missing drill results with the company twice, they don't seem to want to reply.