Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Bitcoin…..sorry for the hostility.
We all want the SP to rise, JP to actually earn his cushty bonus/salary and the assets to come good.
I’m sure you will admit your change of direction/mentality seemed abrupt.
Anyway - let’s hope all of us LTH are rewarded. Including the one ones that been out and are now once again putting their faith (maybe naively) in SML :)
Congratulations on being invested since 2016. June 2016 was my first SML purchase, thankfully I sold the majority of my holding back in the 2017 rise to 3p.
Since 2017….the BOD have delivered nothing! That I agree upon.
Assets still remain and for that reason I’ve bought more over the last couple of years (or maybe I’ve stupidly invested out of sentiment for the share :o).
JP back on the Tsunami/juggernaut front. Let’s see what happens - it’s last chance saloon for him.
Bitcoin, it’s ok to admit you were just simply ramping the share. It’s clear now that’s what you were trying to do.
The rest of the LTH’s here have always been pretty balanced. Called the company out for missed deadlines, called out the mis-management of our assets, but also commended when they’ve actually done something right.
You were the “Hype”.
“Bitcoinbuyer
Posted in: SML
Posts: 5,167
Price: 0.10
No Opinion
RE: Life Support Machine22 Nov 2023 07:44
Hang in the defibrillator is en rote ...2024 is the year of SML...
6 years late... :)
bitcoinbuyer
Posted in: SML
Posts: 5,167
Price: 0.125
No Opinion
RE: The company is finished.1 Nov 2023 10:49
Wonder who is selling at that silly price
Must need the money or have a better proposition on the table
Bottom draw :)”
Come off it bitcoin! You’ve been the companies/assets biggest fan boy for the past 18 months!
The moment they announce some positive tangible news you’re completely negative hahahaha.
As Blacksheep said, in the space of 48 hours you’ve made yourself look like a joke. It’s embarrassing.
Ah, thanks for the clarification Prop. I haven't been reading this board much recently so was very confused.......although it's weird that all of sudden he pops up haha.
"as the politics of Labour’s Momentum does to that of the Tories’ UKIP wing." this made me laugh though.
"Currently, it is not believed that the conditions associated with LCCM's PEPR approval will have a significant effect on timing of planned production and the Company intends providing clarification on this at the beginning of August.
"The Company continues seeking debt style funding for the LCCM project and believes its economic attractiveness will result in securing such funding."
Morning, I contacted the BOD. It should be submitted before the end of the month (March) and it's likely to be confirmed via RNS. It then could be up to 12 weeks to be granted, but they are hoping its quicker than that.
Interesting you should say that! I too enjoyed the ride from 0.30 to 3.00 and subsequently used to profits to help buy a house. Actually my lowest buy was 0.27!
I have however always maintained a stake in SML. The last few years have been painful - but I am still optimistic and have been taking some small top ups below 0.50 over the past few months and this is once again one of my largest holdings.
Confident we will be over 1p in the coming weeks/Months. A PERP approval and financing for LCCM could easily catapult us beyond 1.5p
Since Scott Fletcher joined the board, the ducks have all been lined up. Everything is falling into place.
Short term BlackHopper, this could comfortably be above 10p. Long term, well, sky is the limit.
Thanks Newer, actually thats probably the most important line of the RNS.
Panic over - chill out everyone.
"Should the Project need to replace GE in its role as the technology partner the Company is confident that in conjunction with CMEC it can source a new technology partner and it is not envisaged that such a process would have a material impact on the Project. "
Prop, do you post on Twitter? I'd love to have your rational and balanced posts on my feed. If, Perhaps, you'd rather keep your twitter name off here, no problem - I'll just stick to reading this board :).