Member Info for matherdj

Sounds like a strong case of being invested for fear of missing out (fomo) which is a bad situation/scenario to be in. There won't be anything to miss out on till after finance is in place and many other permissions. Fomo is basically emotional investing and should raise alarm bells when you find yourself there.

And the market is crap at the moment anyway.

Quite right GL. I doubt much will change until after the summer. No news flow expected and always a quiet time. 'Go away in May'.

I agree with everything here, but just to foresee how they'll play the low risk/high risk contradiction. It's low risk to wen because of the way the deal is structured. Scir are still taking the risk (be it low or high in cos terms), but get the initial 3mm.

So all this subsurface unknowns and he didn't think it appropriate to insist on waiting for the 3d results.

It's a very valid question though and one I'd think everyone would like an answer to. I'm sure it will be asked in one way or another. Gneiss fees will surely come up.

A little hint in the wen rns as to the timing of ch1.

This guy gets on it far to early. Must be in and out of the toilets every half an hour. Rack'em up haggis!

I think these two are one and the same. Too coordinated. Best ignored.

You're not listening. I think most agree that - just disagree when that will happen based on what the BoD have communicated at the AGM. Acquisition hadn't started. Results expected September, maybe early October. That's all. Share price may rise before in anticipation.

No one has bashed the company in today's posts, only you haggis really. Crusty had an opinion of 'buy' on all his posts and I said 5p is a reasonable expectation. If you think £1 is where its heading and seismic results could land any day, then it sounds like ramping to me. That doesn't mean I'm doing the opposite. I won't carry this on though. Enough said.

But not 100p positive. That's the difference and seismic ain't coming tomorrow. Time will show.

Rojo, not room.

Wress, apart from room (who will come around in a few months) we are all positive with how things are moving. Haggis has been on the snow and could do with a break from it. Bad habit.

Haggis, I think you are entirely wrong with that assessment and I expect many others feel the same and appreciate the very balanced and honest opinion from him. All his reports from agm's have been proved accurate over many years. Others have challenged in the same way only to look foolish in the end. GL though.

'Following the award of the seismic contract in Q4 2021 and the ongoing mobilisation of the equipment to site, the Joint Venture expects to commence shooting seismic imminently.'

So at the time of that article/rns, aquisition/shooting hadn't begun and there's that old word 'imminently' again. As long as they are on track for November drill still, who cares?

Thank you :)

Crusty, did anyone ask why September 2024 for first gas? Always seemed a very specific target especially when it was first announced and almost 4 years away at that time. From what you said about no decisions as to how/where the gas will be sold, I doubt there is a specific reason for this target, just curious if it was asked.

So you take the value of all the gas once extracted and sold, divide it by the number of shares in issue, and that gives you a shareprice. How insightful. Can't argue with that data :)

I'm positive, but those pumping the article whilst saying things like seismic could land tomorrow,when they know acquisition hadn't even started on the date of the agm, are just dishonest.