Member Info for MassiveRay

This statement here keeps feeling very happy to go on holiday feeling content.

MKS have confirmed that there are no circumstances connected with them ceasing to hold office as the Company's auditor which they consider should be brought to the attention of the Company's members or creditors. They have confirmed that the Company's consolidated financial statements for FY25 are in good and proper order, and are fit for review and finalisation by RPGCC, with whom MKS will cooperate with to ensure a smooth handover of the audit work done so far.

Perhaps change of policy chaebol. "Oversight from the auditor, internal reviews" spring to mind.

Try to digest this and counter it chabol, and mouse in an articulable manner please?

"The appointment of RPGCC follows Moore Kingston Smith LLP ("MKS") resigning as the Company's auditor on 12 August 2025. MKS resigned following a review of their audit portfolio risk profile and their decision to exit assignments with listed clients which involve cryptocurrency trading and assets"

Same question for you mouse?

On what articulable grounds chaebol based off today's RNA do we face delisting?

Mouse - did you know the previous auditor has to release information if they resign due to finding irregularities?

There's *

Sand- i doubt very much gst would state things like this if they were untrue when theirs absolutely no benifet for them as we're currently suspended and would face liable action and a destroyed reputation.

Just a delay with a reassuring note attached our affairs are very much in order as far as our accounting goes.

:)

However read between the lines. They have to disclose their reasons if they found anything wrong if they resign. This hasn't happened to the contrary they have said the opposite.

Not a fook up from the BoD ian. Place your frustration with the auditor.

The "no adverse circumstances" statement

is important.

In the UK, if an auditor resigns due to

suspected wrongdoing or material

accounting issues, they have to disclose it,

MKS explicitly said there's nothing like that

Audit handover means delay, not doom

Even if MKS says the accounts are "in good

and proper order," RPGCC still needs to re-

check and sign them off. That's the

bottleneck now.

D

5. Crypto risk perception is the underlying

friction.

The real cause isn't necessarily GST's own

crypto practices, but that crypto auditing in

general is increasir '* seen as high-risk, and

some firms are exitng that space.

Why does it stink Ian? The rna actually confirms lots of things. The auditor have confirmed they've found nothing wrong to reveal in their accounts.

Well if it was rubbish and all lies Kong gst would be liable for posting misinformation from the auditor. So I'd say you're talking rubbish with no accountability unlike gst.

Exactly leew. We've got confirmation we're doing just fine. It was all to do with the auditor reducing their risk profile for companies trading in crypto.

That's fine zag. But the good news there's no issues from gst's side. That is all shareholders need to know.

Well as its not Friday yet I will continue to post.

My thoughts.

Today's rns confirms it was the previous auditors all along that were holding matters up as they were reviewing their portfolio assets.

We now have confirmation from gst that our affairs are all in order.

Anyone who were bricking it can now relax knowing the auditors were just reducing their crypto risk profile and nothing specific or untoward about gst.

Not the rns I was expecting to land but the content confirms our affairs are in order.

So overall I'm happy :)

Well looks like I've lost the bet. See you in a month...

More lies from you kat. You only revised your shameless ramping post on ITM after I had highlighted it there and asked you to explain your hypocritical behaviour there.

Kat must be suffering with dementia as she keeps repeating herself.