Member Info for MaltLoaf

I think the swing trading likes of DHC are still likely to make 50-100% profit in the near / mid term. With many potential variations on updates this also looks to be a P&D day traders dream.
We have sell, hold or jv scenarios on Brockham / portland. Then you have the planning application on Balcombe and updates on gas venture also on the horizon. The sp could double or even treble in within 100 days or less, so an opportunity for the burned to at least salvage something instead of selling out at rock bottom. Or tempting the masochist lth's to trade their way back up.

How about the BOD freezing their wages for now as gesture to shareholders?

Has DL himself bought out the DOR stake? Would make sense

The old 'buy a partners share'. Worked out nicely for DOR when it was Lidsey and angs sp low before 50% rise back in Feb.

Think about it - buyIng out Doreimus in exchange for low price shares is not good for the company or investors, but only good for Doreimus.

Purchase or contractor payment, or advance

Based on previous skullduggery of angs, you can actually assume all sorts of bad behaviour happening in background and no one can touch you. I think some placement shares have been used in a purchase and maybe sold for cash now for some reason.

The value gets sucked out by dilution. But the LTholders don't seem to acknowledge this and keep expecting the sp to regain lost ground. If the market suddenly values this at below 4p, then you have to be realistic on how much it would climb now. Look how ukog have decimated their sp over time.

RA, if this was 5p June 2018, did you not see sense at selling at 16p. The mind boggles. Are the long term holders really expecting miracle returns? 200% in 6 months would the final exit point of most sane persons.

WOTW Your statement almost had the hallmarks of proverb, until you misspelled the word 'buffoon'.

008 Your wisest post so far : )

E_AL Sometimes posters are put down for stating the obvious, but you make an excellent point on the uptake of placing subscription (compared to OO). I think that there should be some regulatory focus on the purchase of assets in exchange for shares timed at low share prices (when this has proven to be all upside for the asset seller) and at a point of time when there is perceived belief that in overall other prospects may be closer to fruition. Regarding the proposed gas asset purchase, usually a seller agrees to NDA and there may be a retainer bound to this. So it could be already adding to cash-burn.

Yes of course. - if there was some trade off with DOR at this low sp, it would be much to DL's benefit, even on very partial good news

Rxdav, No I don't offer a conclusion on Brockham. Another BOD may have managed the OO differently to raise effectively, with some practical reassurances. But in reality more cut-price shares may have now moved into bigger hands and maybe the price is presently still too high for the risk margins. Who knows? George said himself that they've been forced to bring this price down so low. I just guess that the 'powers that be' demand lower and this hasn't been happened fully yet, hence no real news. All IMHO

The radio silence is all angs strategy. The OO purely a PI PR exercise. This could drop lower. The shares designated for OO, distrIbuted amongst outlets. TR1 publications held back etc. Total silence.

Can anyone explain to me the strategy of either angs or ukog in buying Doreimus out of interests in certain points in time? Is the a strategy beneficial to share holders ukog and angs or instead ore favourable to Doreimus & DL?

Were the Doreimus load of 8m angs shares in exchange for sale of lidsey (bought in Feb @ 3.9p) sold or retained?

It's seems that some in here are banking on no good news making an appearance yet. Strange when it's coming from folk usually banking on things being on the near or immediate up. I think most agree that when some of the big players, like DL ramp, then that may be real a signal to get out. Each to their own interpretation, but I feel the dampeners may be really aiming to fullfill their own prophecy / agenda's. However, fascinating games in play as always ; )

The interviews appeared were subdued in nature and have some rightly said, have dampened the p&d brigade. But is Brockham being purposely played down. Leaving the well sedentary appears to cause more problems experienced i.e. hindering porosity in the performations. Leaving the well inactive while they delay things could cause more expense down the line.

The reason we don't know about the asset is so the ownership can be cleverly divided up. Then when are the full PR ramp, Angus will probably buy mores shares in the asset at inflated prices from these 'quangos' companies, using placement funds. It's win win for them all. Wake up & smell the coffee.