The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Could be the case, price was just on the turn upwards at that time .. so surely would have pushed it downwards not up.
£20 in the pot.
What will this week bring …more from ZM/SN, or a returning shot from the other side?
GL all, LCBK.
that's a good point Earsbern, all submissions in, can they now talk freely?
If so, I would expect an English (American) interview or statement to follow in the coming days.
The timing of the interview, must be relevant.
Wish we could get a full and proper translation (thanks to those that have tried), .. is it just a repeat of the statement the other day, or is there more?
GL All ..
It seems that no pre-arb decision agreement is coming, which is disappointing .. or maybe its all just some last minute posturing from both sides, .. then bham, next week photos shaking hands and both sides happy.
In my dreams anyway ..
nearly 39,000,000 shares makes me the sheriff, but not the not police, of my town .. check with he FSHG authorities if you want.
Just keep to the facts please, .. that was a brilliant find from Oposi earlier, and the docs that came afterwards were equally revealing, but please .. lets try and keep to the real world,
Good, bad, who the **** knows, .. just don't put it all down as fact, good or bad.
GL ALL,
LCBK
Mr Mad,
You are an intelligent chap, that is obvious from the form of your posts, but please don't start making things up, or writing down what you believe to be true, just because you put it down in black and white.
I cant be arsed to pick through everything but ..this sentence. ..
'IMHO it is because the court cases in NY and Texas are very close to a favourable conclusion and the arbitration just needs the change from a 5 year to a 50 year licence extension.'
How please, IYHI, can you explain the above? ..How are they close to a favourable conclusion and more importantly .. where is the evidence of a 5 year to 50 year extension.
GL ALL,
LCBK.
And please soon ..
the letter from the US Senate dated 13th Jan believe,
1. Arb done, we have lost out, please change your mind.
2. Arb not done, please consider the consequences.
3. hold on, the arb is an independent arbitration centred in the Hague .. hmm, we're watching.
4. Lets play nice please, you scratch mine etc ..
5. NOHAFI
GL All, LCBK,
the letter
meant middle of Feb for the replies ..
Could someone remind me of the dates we have on the Arbitration please, .. something like middle of Jan for both parties to submit their final reports, then middle of Jan for each party to reply if required?
So with a bit of luck a fair wind, glass half full etc .. we could hope for the Arb panel to make a decision after this Jan deadline, if both parties are happy with what has been submitted, with no need for further discussions.
Here's hoping anyway ..
LCBK
Can we bump this up a bit .. rest of the cr ap is getting a tad boring.
What is a recognition hearing?
Posted by Oopsi at 11:05 this morning.
Recognition hearing in the claim by the liquidators listed for Wed 15 Jan.
http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov/calendars/mew.html
ignore the '?' after present in previous post .. that was an error and not copied from his cv.
It is ..
Independent Legal Consultant, 2019 - present ?
Frontera Resources Corporation, General Counsel, 2011 – 2019
He left, but would appear he is still working for us as an independent legal consultant.
Below copied from his cv.
Independent Legal Consultant, 2019 - present ?
Frontera Resources Corporation, General Counsel, 2011 – 201
'Third case involved ...'
Involved … Is it finished then ?
GL All,
LCBK
It does finish off with the below line ..
'and all known creditors with United States addresses'
Where is the 'new' company headquarters ?
What am I missing here ? I am not following the positive implications.
The unpaid employees have met with the local officials and Giorgi Tatishvili.
"if there is a deal between Frontera and the state, the government's No. 1 pledge would be to pay off the company's debt. "
What kind of deal? .. I read that as the government paying the debt owed to the employees, .. why not us if there is a deal beneficial to us?
"The head of the agency also noted that there are alternative ways. In case of any of them, the interests of Frontera employees will be protected"
So whatever happens to Frontera, the employees will be taken care of.
ok, so good news for the employees .. where's the positives for us ?
GL to all,
LCBK
Could be he is agreeing with you .. and that is the way it is.
Hope not, but the glass is not very full at the moment.
Good work though, very much appreciated.
Hey KMB,
Saw the message but couldn’t really follow the meaning, .. what do you think the chap (or chapess) was getting at? Just in your opinion ..
Many thanks.
Thanks Coggy, I, and others I am sure , appreciate your honesty.
I am also in that camp, I cannot mentally write this off as people often say, I wish I could, but like you and others, I have put in more than I can afford, so the option to ‘forget about it’ just doesn’t work for me.
I have trust in Mole, Devex, .. never met them and do not know them personally, but I do believe they are very genuine and trustworthy people.
So thinking out loud and maybe in hope more than anything, why the silence? If they have heard nothing, then confirm that is the case, or is it just that they like us have heard zero, so nothing to say?
Best and good luck.
LCBN
Coggy,
As one of the 4, .. and as a respected observer, have you heard or seen anything that others are hinting at, but cannot/will not say, regarding a positive background development, that us shrooms are not aware of?
Thanking you in advance,
Could be that Arnie ..directly below where they demand the trial by jury, the next paragraph ..
PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants respectfully pray for judgment as follows: 1. Plaintiffs take nothing by virtue of this action, and that judgment be rendered in favor of Defendants or, upon consent by Defendants, that this action be dismissed with prejudice to re-filing;
So If we give in completely, admit all wrongdoing (with prejudice), pay all their costs and fee's, they will consider accepting the case be dismissed.
Double bluff with the jury request maybe ?