Member Info for kramreklaw

Awww come on Sain. We don't have to scroll very far down this thread to find the blind optimists saying that this would hit 30-40-50p quickly off the Director buys. In optimistic news PB have finally updated the Directors' page to include the new CEO and remove Vic from the premises. I like to think I brought that to the forefront of their busy little minds in this thread. However, their legal advice page is *STILL* more than 2 years out-of-date of important legislative changes and once again exposes them to fresh legal claims on top of the ones that are already landing... *eyeroll emoji*

Literally invisible on their own Corporate Governance page. Vic still up there. I strongly suggest that any shareholders losing money here sue them for providing false information.

But they've managed to squeak the figures through without the still as yet impending legal cases. Still too many months until that update arrives.

*Raises hand*

I use anyone boasting about their 5* Trustpilot rating as a *strong* avoid.

I take it back. 14p does look like a no brainer based on your post.

Why?

Sorry - reconfirm that it is continuing.

Good morning Sain. Are you also counting down the days to their next public financial statement, to confirm their £2million per month cash burn? I am.

Yes, listing with an expired EPC is an instant offence.

PB pretending they care about compliance all over their PLC website but actually committing gaffe after gaffe after gaffe...

Why did you repeat your claim that they are "profitable" when they shelved revealing their half year results because they hadn't told their auditors about the potential £30 million liability.

Shelving their results *FINALLY* got their professional membership body - Propertymark - to say that they would now have to investigate them.

Sure, absolutely rosy outlook.

So "profitable" that they are currently hiding their results. Oh, how we laugh.

What do you mean?

Estate agents rarely had it so good during the Covid period!!!

In the absence of any meaningful regulation of the sector, we have had to take on the job ourselves. Isn't the first line of consumer protection for business to act honestly and professionally, the second to be for an industry to police itself. The third line of defence are regulators. They have been distinctly absent. This ****hole company have broken the laws of the land from day 1. They should never have been allowed near a stock market flotation. And there's another regulation failure. Investors were duped from day 1. It was easy to predict that we would see this day. I did it myself.

They openly traded illegally from day 1, including hoodwinking investors about the scale of their success rates, should never have been allowed a stock market float and are only just short of killing a tenant or tenants but they seem to have a small amount of time left to do that. But apart from all that...

Sod the share price, can any bulls give me any reason why this company will survive? It cannot do any basics right.

God, I hope they've not gone bust and nicked this guys deposit:

https://twitter.com/ColinMcFadden16/status/1457962804498112516?s=20

Well it's kind of a successful business model...

https://twitter.com/ColinMcFadden16/status/1457962804498112516?s=20

Another potential fee refund:

https://twitter.com/thevimster/status/1458013654377504768?s=20

I'm seriously only going back 24 hours in the timeline here...

https://twitter.com/tashballantyne/status/1458029552236736517?s=20

What's a Prop Tech firm without any... tech..?

https://twitter.com/PurplebricksUK/status/1458119195632230409?s=20