Member Info for kopfkissen

I've a feeling it's a ChatGPT generated post : contains lots of qualifiers such as 'it seems', 'potentially', 'could further complicate', 'reportedly', which is characteristic of ChatGPT posts.

Got to say I'm struggling with this claim, that "ETF approval kills GST Business model". Can't really see any connection, they seem to me to be two totally different concepts.

Tricky do you not have live prices?

Oops, sorry, thought you had said just half an hour left !

An hour and a half isn't it ,?

If you don't like my posts, you know how you can filter me. And you are bloody rude.

AHS - don't be so bloody rude.

Not surprising, but it would be nice if we could close above 1.3.

As you are a cardinal, I defer to your superior knowledge.

I wonder if the good lord can repeat his previous trick of turning 7 fishes into $28 billion ? ( that was what he did wasn't it ?).

Yes, praise the Lord !

Oh Jesus, not here as well paedoinvestor - everywhere I look you are there, like a bloody rash.

So ,are you buying at the moment Duke ?

Two sells, totalling 1,750,000 shares, haven't dented the buying !

Thanks Manifesto now that I can understand and accept, rather than the previous theory that because the trade was at a higher price than the one following it, then it must be a buy !

That's dodgy logic - all the preceding trades were at a higher price. If the 58 mill was a sell, as I think it was, then it would have lowered the price, as evidenced by the 0.2241 trade following the sell

Thanks for that. Need to brush up on my street slang !

OK, I give in - what does LFG mean ?

Not sure either of those big trades were buys - the price was lower than most preceding trades.

Will probably be ruined by a wave of sells later, but at the moment I'm enjoying it.