Member Info for katstrangler

You're very wrong.

i posted that i thought the sp would dip to 0.68 or worse (check the post). everything else is just insults because i suggested the sp would drop.

the culprits are splatted, massiveray and aimhigherstill. if they filtered my posts there wouldn't be an issue. but if you think i'm going to let them get away with insults or nonsense posts about 'whooshing' then think again.

get them to filter me and the bb will be less cluttered.

And, again, where was the 'whoosh'ing! if anyone thinks they're orcales for the share, it's those that bang on endlessly about "In times like these the public are looking for the cheapest option...I give you...neobanking" and other empty ramps.

just tell the tired folk who live on here exlusively to find something better to do than print weak-assed bullying posts.

You should check how many posts are actually mine and how many are angry posters who try to get abusive (i'm assuming the greens are name calling?). take it up with those posters who spend more time badmouthing other posters and not talking about the share. oh, and there was no orders being filled. just live price buying.

Suspect (though who knows, in this market!) that ZOO will have a similar downturn on their results later in the week.

the writer's guild vote can't come soon enough but the actors still needs to be sorted so the sp could still suffer before the upturn. but calling the bottom of any share is a bloodie chore so i figured a 30% discount is good enough for now.

From what i can see, i made a grand o the last buy, from averaging down and then selling on the spike. i've also 'made' on being out on this drop so i'll be up automatically on the next buy, even if the sp continues to drop.

you seem to think that 'hundreds' is nothing and yet you also think that being 30% down in Sept from the spike is also nothing.

and you genuinely think my position is worse than yours?

i'll be putting you on filter now as the 3 gstkateers here like talking to themselves and i can't be bothered to interject anymore. not until i buy back.

but good luck with your investment.

No doubt ZOO price has already has already taken some of the concerns into the price but the makret is being bluddy vicious atm.

and it looks like, while we're waiting on the more immediate effects of the vote on live tv, it's going to take a good while for shows and films to get back into the swing of things.

think maybe the buying y'day was just a little premature, on the news.

I'd rather be buying on a rising stock instead of holding and hoping my personal pr campaign is going to swing the market!

Some absolute rubbish being posted about 'neo banks' in times of hardship???

the agm diesn't promise anything other than a vote. no need for an rns before it to make the agm go through as BoD request.

i'll buy before it but only if the sp gets to 0.68 or 'worse'.

bb now hosted by the same three posters, all underwater, all emotionally tied to the share and subjectively posting weird mantras, like some communist party promo campaign.

seriously, whether you're doing it secretly in spite of your ramping or actively, do something to mitigate your holding. there are no macho awards for 'i'm holding millions' in an sp that's sliding.

i hope it works out for you in the long run.

Have to assume that there's a correction to come (be bloody miserable if the drop WAS the correction!)

V low volume atm but...

see how it progresses today.

gla.

Should be coming soon, prompted by this agreement (though it's still to be formally accepted).

Usually, if there's a buying spree (i honestly can't tell if there is one here as the sp is soooo messed up with silly tiny and huge trades) and it looks overbought i'll sell at least try and take advantage of a possible dip to get more shares for the same cash total. but, honestly, this is the first share i can remember in recent times that dropped significantly and then took back its value so slowly. i'm hoping this week sees TR1s that get it back over 1800. the higher it goes, the more tempted i'd be to sell (though 2200 does seem to be at least what one could anticpate in the coming weeks).

I agree, CHLL have a superior product generally but it's going to need finessing in various territories to max it (which i'm sure they're on top of).

i don't know if they're making NHS enquiries or not but i would like to think they're moving across to include that angle for their range?

besides, that, as i said, it's the warrants that keep me here (though i accept that they don't HAVE to be taken up).

apologies if i put anyone's nose out of joint... as you said, the more one posts on these sites, the tendency is to get adversarial but i'm just trying to keep it balanced at echo chambers don't make for the best investing policy unless one is part of a ramp crew!

happy sunday!

And, yes, i'm a holder. just looking at those warrants as my reason for holding.

Https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/sep/22/superdrug-to-stop-selling-single-use-vapes-in-uk-and-ireland

Splatted, still in your head, then.

no need to respond. really, no need. give everyone else a breather.

"objectivity doesn't happen when you've staked a big pile of cash on the share...." and you're in the red.

ost holders have limited cash funds and it's bloody madness to keep piling more money into a share, even when averaging down, unless you're following a major BoD investment. and even then, you're followign millionaires who are also being paid to work the share and have fingers in a dozen or pies that influence each other.

it's just not as simple as constantly averaging down!.

i can't even begin to work out if this will rise to 1p before the cash call/share issuance or whether it'll be 0.5p. i just figure i'll happily jump onto a speeding train to enjoy some profits as opposed to prematurely jumping onto a train that about to derail!

them's your choices.

Only a sadder man would live their life on this one bb, posting 240 times in one month and think his posts have been an asset to the sp or the bb.

yo've been calling out 'sad' trolling since 1p when they've said the price would drop and yet we sit at 0.75 and how have the threat of a vote to add 50% more shares to the pot.

you can tell yourself that there'll all be issued at a premium but there's no guarantee of that.

objectivity doesn't happen when you've staked a big pile of cash on the share.

ask yourself this: if you now had that money as cash, on monday morning, would you buy into GAST or would you look at the rest of the market to spot a share with better short term prospects?

that's all you need to answer.

but good luck, all, whatever your choice.

Strictly speaking, you have an agenda too. to say that vaping is 'good' for you, rather than 'bad' is relative. compared to nicotine, it's 'good', compared to not vaping, it's bad.

there aren't sufficient tests done on whatever IS inhaled on medium or long term affects. it's not as if they are medicianl or, rather, they would be if prescribed, but only to get people off nicotine.

so, just accept that everyone has an agenda and you're cloaking your own in hlth benefits while it is, in fact, financail.

if CHLL products WERE NHS approved, that'd be something else. but it would have to be vey specific products. if they could be tinkered with to become a medicinal product to assist with asthma or reduced oxygen uptake for those with health issues, again, another, and glorious, matter.

but these are 'entertainment' products. and there's very little in them that could be seen to be positive in absolute terms.

while that argument seem to be a mainly UK and European issue, it's becoming a worldwide issue.

But in the v short term, yes, the banning of all the crappy illegal products that have flooded the markets would do the sp here some real ood. Single use would also help because it ligitimises the product. It's the requvalent of adding filters to cigarettes.

but, as i said, everyone has an agenda when it comes to making or losing moeny. and those that are against single use products are just looking to make their money from that, too.

Strictly speaking, you have an agenda too. to say that vaping is 'good' for you, rather than 'bad' is relative. compared to nicotine, it's 'good', compared to not vaping, it's bad.

there aren't sufficient tests done on whatever IS inhaled on medium or long term affects. it's not as if they are medicianl or, rather, they would be if prescribed, but only to get people off nicotine.

so, just accept that everyone has an agenda and you're cloaking your own in hlth benefits while it is, in fact, financail.

if CHLL products WERE NHS approved, that'd be something else. but it would have to be vey specific products. if they could be tinkered with to become a medicinal product to assist with asthma or reduced oxygen uptake for those with health issues, again, another, and glorious, matter.

but these are 'entertainment' products. and there's very little in them that could be seen to be positive in absolute terms.

while that argument seem to be a mainly UK and European issue, it's becoming a worldwide issue.

But in the v short term, yes, the banning of all the crappy illegal products that have flooded the markets would do the sp here some real ood. Single use would also help because it ligitimises the product. It's the requvalent of adding filters to cigarettes.

but, as i said, everyone has an agenda when it comes to making or losing moeny. and those that are against single use products are just looking to make their money from that, too.