Member Info for katstrangler

And someone new isn't towing the 'this share is fab' mantra that holders kee[ wanting to hear, even though the sp is down another 5%, even at the lows.

you'd think BoD'd have the good manners to at least arrange a sh**** cln to get to this level, first!

AHS, you've turned from a great poster to a grate poster. you've literally had a pop at everyone, including your old mates, Massiveray a splatted, who seem to have now given up the ghost with painting the picture of why this should be £2.50 (share price, not mcap).

you need to take yourself out of the game for a little while because your posts are doing nothing for the sp and everything to show how slightly manic you've become since losing all paper profits you've had since being the genius and funding the share on the lowest price ever.

still, give it a couple of weeks and you might get another chance!

take a rest, ol' chum, you're fraying at the edges.

You keep going, lad. thank god you have your business knowledge to keep you ahead of the game, here!

Just because it's lower doesn't make it a good buy!

the share's been sidelined by the market and by me too.

but keep going with the 'ducks in a row' nonsense. all that i'm seeing atm is some opportunistic averaging down and a slower rate of selling. but still selling, if the mm's will let them go through.

'a better second half of the year'!

you clown! how could it not when it's dropped 55% since the hour before the 1.05 placing!

even now you can't be certain that the sp won't fall to 0.5!

of course it'll be better as, if it was worse it'd be bust!

Don't they make their money on the margins? would've though volatility works in their favour?

Https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/robinhood-halts-trading-amidst-global-market-meltdown-3554009

Https://x.com/SJosephBurns/status/1820393578385846341

Not sure how it's fantastic if most of the assets are now in debate or stalled or waiting on genuine price?

makes you wonder how it was able to hold such a good price for so long this year... oh, yes. i remember...

Noone... because it's NT to sell. so unless you're going to tempt fate to put in a silly price...

A tad optimistic to think this is safer than big banks, considering it's already lost 50% before this news.

mercifully, it's NT to sell but imagine if this takes a hit there'll be a bounce. just where the bottom is for the bounce to happen!

Https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2024/08/05/crypto-futures-witness-840m-in-liquidations-as-bitcoin-nosedives-ether-records-biggest-fall-since-2021/

That said, the interims will be interesting. and another one where you'll either wish you were in or... weren't and then looking to end of year.

I'm not sure that your integrity saves you from the questionmarks about GST, Lloyd, as like me and many others, we're all invested from at least when 1.23 was thought of as the bottom of the future price!

my point was too many of the recent rns' are pretty much open-ended with no understanding of the true cost of the assets. We've had placings that hint at assets and then we have assets identified but they all have odd conditions or prices tba so still no clues as to their true worth.

it's probably the reason why, since the 1.05p placing the sp has... not performed. Easysend is now in the long grass, we have Bonfirepay, which noone has heard of but might get a licence (though how long it'll take to integrate into the wider platforms is...

Stablecoins, which was mooted as being sorted in time for the GE or because Wellesley was onboard, is now seen as taking a different route to FCA approvals and therefor longer to... be!

it looks like the placings are, indeed for supporting the infrastructure but that could be endless untill such time as the company is making a genuine profit to be able to fund itself.

it's amazing how the sentiment is flagging now that the ramps and the sp have diverted and all the positivity from people who just 'dyor' by reading the most proflific posters has dissipated.

now left with people over-bought and overwrought, taking their angst out on posters and not their own choices.

it could all turn on the next news and the next news could be substantial but i doubt it'll be what is hoped for, unless people think Benfirepay is going to solve all ills here.

Lloyds right that, if you can hold (if only based on the fact that every dog seems to have a good day in the markets eventually) then you'll get your money back and make some. but it's been a disappointing 2024 so far and doesn't seem to be getting better until Q4 and even that is moot, unless you're gung ho on BoDspeak.

Why would i need to say anything positive when it's already out there! what ISN't out there, as it's accompaied by personal jibes and aggressions, is the critical thinking about what is announced.

for example: why would Semnet sell themselves for barely the inticipated profit on just the one $36mill contract (if based on the pre tax profit from last financials?). it'd not as if Semnet just got the cold call on the day but would have, presumably, been enged for months for such a large contract? in fact, one would suspect they'd already been engaged with them previously, as a try out? so why wasn't it reflected in the price they negotiated with GST?

of course, holders here will make the case that either GST are superb negotiators or there's something else in the deal to make it desirable (besides getting the same job out of it and options) but the fact that it sounds just too good to be true...

and it's the same with Easysend. They seem to be doing better than GST atm so one would have thought the price will be significant to make it worthwhile, even if the ceo keeps a percentage. so, how much is THAT fundraise going to be for to bring it home?

Been querying the Semnet deal since its rns or, at least, how a company jumps from $5mill annual turnover to $36mill in a single unverifiable contract. the fact it arend $200k profit, PRE TAX, make me wonder why pay such an open-ended amount for something noone here has any personal knowledge of, nor why it just happens to be connected to a spouse, holding shares still is... just... a bit... coincidental?!?!

folk would rather make up the missing parts to supprt their beliefs than be pragmatic and take out some funds. i guess that's because, having lost 50% since the placing the desire to 'get it back first', a bit like a roulett player with his winning system, feels it'll turn good. 'course, that's what people were saying at 1.23 when the placing for the 'acquisiton' happened.

at this point, even averaging down is dodgy as, if the price IS to fall, you're just adding to your paper losses and, at some point, that will have to be realised, one way or another.

and, as far as i can tell, the Easysend deal is laughably unrealised. in fact, investors here would make more moey ie Easysen were just to IPO. people just don't question the value of such an asset, except that it'd be great for GST. if it'll be that transformational, then what price? Same with Semnet, if they're suddenly so increadibl with contracts, why so cheap?

Nm

So "remain committed to successfully completing " is the same as having completed?

i think the desparation lies with the rampers because it failing would not be good.

Still not agreed.

still not priced.

still not approved.

the minute FCA approves or otherwise is the minute the sp moves.

" Completion of the acquisition of EasySend remains conditional, inter alia, on the entering into of definitive sale and purchase documentation and also on GST obtaining approval from the FCA for the change of control of EasySend, a regulated entity. The Company expects to complete the acquisition in Q2/Q3 2024 and further announcements will be made regarding the acquisition in due course."

All that has happened is there continuing discussions into November.