RE: A bit o fpedantry24 Mar 2021 17:24
Lets be honest.....
Once we start getting full confirmation that the tonnage for Bushranger or perhaps Racecourse alone (if multiple Porphyry ) goes beyond the required 2MT... up towards 3... perhaps beyond that and onto 4... am pretty sure no one will even remember the hole 1 Assays inspired tit for tat and whether there was a 0.02% statistical discrepancy in a speculated number nor a wording quibble with adjective choice in an interview.
In the grand scheme of things this BB is keeping each other entertained it seems, but ultimately splitting hairs on detail that just doesnt, nor will ever, really matter.
The depths of these holes, the different directions they all face (which lets be honest none of us really know), the constant talk of mineralisation shallower and deeper, both before and after expectation, alongside the future planned drilling not even started...... all amass to one thing only. Add in the candour and excitement of every interview (word choice aside) and its fairly obvious whats coming. Or at least is incredibly highly likely.
Which bit is 0.2, which bit is 0.3, which is 0.6, whether a cut off exists or not.... its all bystander speculation from the touchlines whilst a monster, of beyond expectation size, is being unveiled slowly but surely.