RE: News15 Jun 2026 10:31
Just awaiting for news. Even at the very worst scenario (which is unlikely - as the 'fundamentally flawed ' process highlighted in the RNS was clearly restated for a reason - it is a big clue ), MPL's asset would not freefall like it would were it a software/IP asset because 1. This port remains valuable regardless of ownership 2. MPL still has value outside the KTPL dispute because it remains a UK‑listed parent company with its own corporate structure, cash resources, land and long‑term leases, physical port‑related infrastructure already built, operational capability, logistics relationships, and the ability to raise capital or acquire new assets, meaning that even if KTPL were lost, MPL would still own real, tangible, income‑producing assets.
3. The COC is a syndicate of lenders - that would explain the delay in any settlement news as unanimity would need to be reached at each stage and as the CoC is a multi‑lender syndicate, MPL’s challenge has exposed the alleged procedural flaws to multiple independent legal teams, increasing scrutiny rather than reducing it.