Member Info for janes

Lol that's why I gave the information. For you to go and look it up....

i've already ****ed this up. justice2u now has my number. can you message him? or contact me on jane@jscs.org.uk for my number and add me to the group?

Hi I need you all to get on one thread because I'm knee deep in a case at the moment, and whilst I'm an expert multi tasker, I don't yet walk on water. If we can get a group together, off page, I'm happy to hold a video call when there are enough and I'll go take advice from my IP.

If they breach the agreement with the bondholders this gives the bondholders the right to call in an administrator. Then, under the relevant schedule of the Insolvency Act 1986, the Administrator will have a duty to act in the best interests of the company. Administration's primary objective is to rescue the company but destroying the company is often the easiest and it is because of the conduct of insolvency practitioners that we now have an APPG on weaponised insolvency. Do not get me wrong I love making money but I think there is enough money for everyone. Risk is fine. As long as the rules are adhered to and here, I KNOW rules have not been adhered to in several areas

Well, we are well met.

Good to meet you all. I'm not saying we can do anything, but we MIGHT be able to. I'm not interested in getting paid for old rope, and neither will I make promises, but I can fill some gaps and I will need some of you to help me fill gaps without which we cannot progress.

Who can create the whatsapp group? I cannot risk putting my number here for obvious reasons though you can contact me on colin@jscs.org.uk and ask for my number IF it is not publicised.

Alright, let me assume that there are friendlies here. For me to even risk taking this any further, I am going to surmise what is going to happen next. Someone will come on this thread shouting obscenities, saying I'm a fake this, a CMC, a bottom feeder and so on. You can check out the bad press - Jane Sanders helping Simon Hume Kendall and bondholders and so on, and you will be referred to Holy Smokes where they make allegations spanning from international spy to 'larger than life' (or not so polite) sewer rat.

That generally happens when I've got too close to something. If i'm right, then those of you that are serious are going to be asked to help me rebut those things. I don't have time to combat this again, and the last time I did it, my children were threatened. I'm not going through that again UNLESS i get some public support from those of you that are professional enough to read between the lines. Is there STILL an appetite? If so, we are on.

Can i just clarify: are there any shareholders here who are classified as retail clients under the FCA's regime? This is a critical point for me i.e. when you bought shares have you all bought them in your own right trading on your own account?

Touche. I'm not worried about fees at first instance what I need to know with immediate effect is how many of you want to do something, and what appetite you may have?

Yep... you aren't wrong, but I am telling you now that even if I were to offer assistance - this sight is not appropriate for that, if you all argue it will not work. You would be amazed what you can achieve in numbers and I work hand in glove with an Insolvency Practitioner just one for good reason. He is open minded and is able to work with the unusual person that is me. And we do it well. If you guys can get your heads around working together, you potentially have a remedy though I warn you: this is a dirty business and rules often get broken, and people hurt and disappointed.

Okay for obvious reasons I am repeating that I got stung by seeking the truth at my own cost pertaining to the legal case. However, where there's a will there's a way and it MAY be that you could pool your collective weight (in value not numbers) to make a move. However, that is caveated by the premise that you would need to work together to pool your collective numbers and resources and I'm not sensing that you would all be amenable to doing so. Am I wrong?

Not if the bondholders seek to appoint pursuant to a breach of their terms. And I can already see that getting you all to work together would be impossible. If they get their own IP in, then control goes to that IP and you effectively get shut out entirely

I've sat watching this for the last 18 months religiously. I'm a specialist lawyer, I deal with insolvency and financial regulation in the UK and, to a lesser extent, other jurisdictions. I also intermediate multi million pound financial disputes.

I have received my only real bad press from a 16 year career having been 'affiliated' with both sides of the case involving one of IOG's funders. So you know I had a potential conflict. One which the press made a meal of, and brought a world of threats to my door.

I've watched the shares move from their 44p height to suspension and watched the despair that has accompanied it, whether you are trading the shares, shorting or otherwise. Mindful of the therm prices, the need for the bond to be repaid or renegotiated, and hitting water, I was curious about the action that the shareholders mentioned, and what action you all think you could take. Obviously, I have my own arguments and one in particular, but I'm curious to hear the basis upon which you are considering an action.

If the reception to my post is well met, I'll continue. Any nonsense, threats and/or anything else in poor taste, no matter how heightened people are, and I'm out. Best to all, Jane

Not sure if it's the end yet. Need to know what's happened first. Who knows what?

Afternoon all I'm a specialist lawyer appointed by some investors in Xplorer. Mind if I ask you when and how much you each invested AND when?