Member Info for Intrusivethought

Exactly. We are just speculating what might transpire in the event they do not settle expeditiously.

Fine tuning.

Assuming a win at trial in the US, I fully expect Nanoco to seek preliminary injunctive relief in Germany.

https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/eu-court-removes-german-barrier-preliminary-patent-injunctions

The most important development is that Samsung Display will almost certainly have been cited as a defendant, and so will now be directly drawn into the infringement dispute.

You cannot underestimate the significance of the German litigation. It has changed the game considerably.

Perhaps. Confer with one of your professor friends Nig.

It is a rational expectation my friend. Not a certainty.

You raised the notion of confidential information, not I.

Hence I believe it is likely imminent. Note likely.

Indeed. Suffice to say, without getting too involved, post German litigation move, settlement is the optimal solution (at this point in time) in this litigation 'game'.

Clue: Nash equilibrium.

Hmmm.... let's see.

It's coming.

That was always the plan.

CFQD production will be licensed to others. Novel nanomaterials for use in advanced electronics applications (including IRQDs) will be produced in-house.

Also, a settlement is in the pipeline.

will be a mainstream display technology, requiring enormous quantities of CFQDs:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpMgNZ14Y-s

Nothing to win and nothing left to lose.....

False.