Member Info for Intrusivethought

For LG?:

"...from next year, it is expected to spur the production of high-density thin film using LGD's QD material by collaborating with LGD."

https://www.edaily.co.kr/news/read?OutLnkChk=Y&mediaCodeNo=257&newsId=03384966632460120

https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/cmos-image-sensor-market-sees-perfect-storm/

Decline in the short-term, however unit shipments projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2026.

Samsung Electronics now obtain their LCD panels from manufactures such as BOE.

Not so. Samsung Display did not and do not produce QLED panels. Rather, Samsung Electronics would buy LCD panels from Samsung Display, incorporate the QD film and then brand and sell as QLED.
Indeed, Samsung Display have ceased manufacturing LCD panels altogether to focus on QD-OLED.

The article is incorrect. The QLED panel will not be supplied by Samsung Display. More s**t journalism I'm afraid.

Like Germany, injunctive relief is automatic upon finding infringement.

No Hawi... no Sir. Touchy much?

Come Fly with Me............. lol

Indeed Matty.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/NANO/litigation-update-further-revised-trial-date/15647164

https://www.displaydaily.com/article/display-daily/breakthrough-thinking-in-microled-and-the-implications-for-qdel-blue-dots

If i recall correctly, nanoco have patents covering the large-scale manufacture of highly photoluminescent blue 2d dots.

Of course, that's a possibility.

Agree with your view BC. Without prejudice settlement negotiations will likely be ongoing before, during and after trial until a satisfactory agreement is reached.

None of the criticisms of the article detract from the fundamental conclusion that automatic injunctive relief significantly impacts settlement behaviour, by shifting bargaining power from the infringer to the patentee.

https://copenhageneconomics.com/publication/economic-implications-of-automatic-injunctions-in-german-patent-litigation/

As I asserted previously, the commencement of the German litigation will have improved the terms-of-trade in this litigation dispute considerably further in favour of Nanoco. Expect a settlement to be reached imminently.

All good Morbox. I'm not so delicate.

https://www.specialsituationinvestments.com/2022/09/nano-patent-litigation-multibagger-upside/

Apologies if posted previously, I don't remember seeing this.

LOL

Agreed. You've provided some good analysis on this hj. Certainly got me thinking. Appreciated.

A question, is the lodgement of an adequate security an absolute requirement per se, or do the courts have some room for discretion according to the particulars of each case?