Member Info for Intrusivethought

Also, they raised funds from pi's partly on the basis of those comments. Whereas funds from larger shareholders were latterly raised via a loan note for which they've received a very healthy return. Very fair you think?

Exactly. After 9th Jan.

Pi's were deliberately misled re the litigation uo until the 9th Jan RNS.

They certainly have lost a good amount of credibility with pi's, for sure. But let's see what transpires. Also, the 2D patents, which FH failed to mention, appear to be exceptional. No other entity can do what is claimed, to the point that many OEMs have pretty much given up on trying to incorporate 2D materials into mass produced consumer electronics. If you have some knowledge of or background in materials science, look at the patents and you will understand my excitement. When will the tech be commercialised?... only the company will know, but the 2D materials company wasn't set up for nothing imo.

At least for today we're not IQE or, heaven forbid, WAND!

Lol - no meant as an insult.

Well my plan was and still is to hold for 5 years yet.

True. They are full of it.

Perhaps, then again the process is not labour intensive. And cost is lower still if not having to pay any licence or royalty fees.

HH I do agree that we were misled up until 9th Jan RNS, regarding the litigation. That is a fair point.

If you believe they're a busted flush and still hold, that speaks volumes about you. God help.

Indeed. It makes no sense that samsung are 90% of the market, yet nanosys expanded thier production capacity to 50 tons. What for? the remaining 10%. Doubt it. And at the same time SD started to invest billions in their QD-OLED manufacturing line.

If so, they might still require a second supplier at some point.

https://nanosys.com/press-releases/2019/7/23/nanosys-completes-multi-million-dollar-expansion-for-quantum-dot-production#:~:text=Technicians%20operate%20a%20two%2Dstory,facility%20in%20Silicon%20Valley%2C%20California.
Production capacity expanded to 50 tons per year. Using hot injection........ I don't think so. That's 50 million Qled tvs per year. Me thinks Samsung Display were lining them up as a second supplier of Cad free dots for their QD-OLED panels.

Anyone recall how many years exactly are remaning on the seeding patents?

Remember that companies such as Nanosys are a direct competitor, thus there may be other remedies available to Nanoco.

Samsung and Nanosys were in cahoots.

Indeed Nanonano. It confers far more control over the creation of the dots and thus enabling the production of better quality dots Also x20 more efficient process.

OEMs will soon switch to using Nanoco's materials.

Just pursue any infringer in Germany only and obtain an injunction. Quicker, cheaper, Job done.