George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
Scrambler you will only get lies out of it.
tomtum115 Sep '21 - 17:39 - 62256 of 62267
0 2 2
The big question no one whats to answer. Is it a SCAM. I'm sure the gerbils in the rats next LSE will have a view later .
Remember any of you on LSE tonight post on all their threads as when they report you . All their threads get deleted .
Nothing nicer than wrecking there little group
Pmsl
Extrader the 41m bond isnt Tag/1af2 anymore its owned by Eight Capital. Its always been DW or Eight Capitals. Its secured on Syme shares thats it. Thd 61m is TAGs nothing to do with Eight Capital.
Is that plain enough FFS
Extrader why are you mixing up the two. 61m bond issue is to buy a part of the captive bank. Nothing else. We will see in the prospectus. The 41m bond and vendor loan is Eight Capital issue. The vendor loan might dilute Eight capital share holders as per their RNS. The vienna bond is Eight Capital taking advantage of leverage.
So in other words theres no limitations.
I notice your mate castle posted this on the other channel.
Just sow the seeds of doubt over on the rats nest LSE. Just ask questions as they don't know the answers.
It creates a nervous with Shareholders. Especially when the rampers can't answer.
And you associate with this person..
Yawn extrader
The vendor loan is for the puchase of the 41 million euro boads from Iwep.
The Vendor Loan is intended to be repaid by the raising of new equity capital and the issue of other securities by the Company in stages, in the short-term. This may include an equity placing via an open offer to all shareholders. Warrants and/or other securities may also be included in the capital raise. From ECP RNS.
Anyway thats nothing to do with Syme that DWs problem. As he is no longer employed by Syme I dont care what he does.
Now the 61m where does it stipulate limitations on the use of money for this bond. Please cut and paste to validate what you say....