Member Info for gmed-2

RE: On a positive note.....15 Jan 2026 22:04

As it is so frustrating and worrying to see this relentless dropping to our price i take some comfort from the fact that although we are down circa 30% in just the last few weeks it's done on the back of very little selling volume rather than massive selling pressure that would suggest of sinking ship.....

Absolutely right, Max. The SP is sinking simply by lack of buying, rather than intense selling. Lack of news = lack of buying.

Has it struck anyone else that this is a remarkably active board for a share that hasn't traded in over half a year.

Maybe one day someone will publish a Steven - English dictionary

Giving up on the default/no default argument was a good idea. I suggest you chaps do the same. And the best in the new year to all!

Sigh...I give up.

Well, this IS Christmas time, when miracles do happen. Hey, didn't you ever see Miracle on 34th Street? (If you haven't seen it, find the original version from 1947. It's better than the remake.)

Saying Angus defaulted on its debt is another way of saying they didn't pay the interest and principal as promised, which is true. But legally, the company is NOT in default because no notice of default was ever served. If it had been, the company would have had to issue an RNS. There! That's that question sorted. Next subject, please.

Could someone please tell me what the point of this ridiculous discussion is?

I can promise you that what BP says about his UKOG warning is absolutely true. His warning that things didn't look quite right technically got me out of UKOG in time with a VERY handsome profit. And I don't mean loose change for the pub profit, more like new car. I only wish I had listened to him when he first warned us about Angus a long, long time ago. I'd have a much fatter bank account right now. So say what you like about him, I'm a BP fan.

Some people see it as making a loss. I look at it more as building up a healthy tax loss carry-forward.

FB - I've added too. Got a "well,.... ok" go-ahead from mrs gmed. For her this is great enthusiasm when it comes to aim shares.

Glad to hear you're on the mend.

Funky, did you take the whole thing?

Hi 99 - I don't see why a deal/sale couldn't proceed. As far as we know, the ownership of the mine isn't being contested, only the arbitor's ruling on payment. So the mine could be sold, for example, and the court case about the money would continue independently. But then again, we don't know what Hebei is asking the court to do. In any case, I think Dennis is absolutely correct in his approach: don't throw too much good money after bad, but use the funds we have to yield a more certain and, in the longer-term, more profitable return. If we win the case and get our money, great. But if we lose, we've already got a reasonable amount out of the purchase (the selling price was unrealistically high) and the company have better things to do. So let it be water under the bridge and devote company time and resources to activities with a profitable future. Say what you like about Dennis, but the man is a solid, sensible businessman, someone this company has desperately needed for its entire history.

Well said, NG. This RNS is far better than anything I ever expected. We're not out of the woods yet, but at least there's cause for some optimism, for a change.

Ah, Kyle, those were the good old days. "Just turn on the tap". Remember?

AGBR - Makes perfect sense; I think you're dead on.

A placing with insiders now at this low price before any good news is released? A sure sign that news is on the way and it will be good.

I think I see where this one's going and it don't look good. I hope I'm wrong.

Good news indeed. But didn't they know about this objection all along? If they did, no one ever told us.

Still cheaper than putting it on their crefit card