Member Info for gdog

Hey KPM and Milhous,

KP, things going almost too well in the Dawg's kennel. It scares me...I keep wondering when a shoe is going to drop (US saying?).

Milhous: blinkx ADRs were 10 shares of blinkx per ADR. Citibank underwrote them. There was virtually no market for them. But blinkx was a different company, so there is hope...but...as I've mentioned here before: since the underlying stock will still trade on the AIM, and we've grown significantly in terms of share price relative to company fundamentals, I am doubtful of the success of the ADSs as far as a big bump in our price is concerned above current valuations. This is short term thinking only.

That being said, if our fundamentals keep improving, look out above, regardless of the (what I feel is) absurd 2 shares per ADS. We're not so stupid over here that we can't figure out a fundamentally cheap stock when we see one, whether it's $11 or $22.

Gino,

I already tried that. Didn't help.

Ignorance can be cured with education. That being the case, I wrote investor relations asking why two TRMR shares per one ADS.

I'll post the answer after they respond.

BTW: While education is a cure for ignorance, there is no cure for stupid.

BTW: I realize my post about $5 being an obstacle makes very little sense, since we're trading around $11 now.

So I did a search and came up with this:

"Many mutual funds don't even allow their managers to own stocks that trade below $5 a share since the risk is considered too great. That said, hedge funds can own whatever they want, and if they see value in a low-priced stock they will jump in with zero fear."

Also this:

Can a mutual fund own a stock for less than$ 5?

"It's often said that mutual funds and other institutional investors can't own stocks that trade for less than $5, condemning low-priced stocks to retail ownership only."

I have no idea what genius came up with the stupid idea of 2 common shares of TRMR for 1 ADS, but it appears to me to be a moronic move, unless I am totally ignorant of why they did this, which may be the case...but I doubt it.

KPDm,

I had a pretty good idea that may be the case, but the number I had in my head was $5.00 per share. My understanding for decades has been a lot of funds have it in their charter that they can't invest in companies with a share price below $5.00.

I always thought this was pretty stupid, since market cap and enterprise value are what really matter.

IDK...the fact that we're offering 2 ordinary shares as one ADS makes things rather confusing.

I have an idea why they're doing this, but still, I think it's lame.

Q: How do you know if somebody went to Harvard?

A: They tell you.

Many of the stupidest people I know went to Ivy League Schools. They may have high IQs, but these people are morons when it comes to getting along well in life. Nothing replaces common sense.

The man who went to the hospital "yesterdie"...was he "Scooottish"?

I've spoken with a number of Scots. I could not understand what the hell they were saying. It was as if we were speaking in different languages. Perhaps we were?

Huh?

I sent the club a wire stating, "PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION. I DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT PEOPLE LIKE ME AS A MEMBER".

[Variant:] "Please accept my resignation. I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member".

OK, enough this one.

Coat,

To be precise: “I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.”

Coathanger,

At least I didn't try to rip the quote off. Notice the single quotation marks. I paraphrased because I didn't take the time to get it precise.

Hey Coathanger,

I was waiting for somebody to pick that up. You're pretty quick.

I gotta admit, I like that quote.

'Personally, I wouldn't join any club that would have me as a member.'

The boot licker Macron welcoming the USA back into the 'all talk, do nothing G7 club': oh boy, just what we want.

Open your wallets, US taxpayers.

What a worthless summit.

Hey Radium,

I think it's safe to assume you're telling the truth about your affection for our village idiot.

That being said, the very best revenge for his annoyingly over the top posts is for TRMR to crush it in terms of performance. So far so good.

Fingers crossed all longs here and on ADVFN get to share in that revenge to an enormous degree.

Hey Centro,

Thanks for the chuckle.

Top of my morning to you.

Centro,

I like "me" just the way I am.

GSmiley,

You are about as well informed as our resident village idiot. Talk about things of which you are aware, or don't talk at all.

You often post pretty late at night UK time.

Are you a bit of a night owl?

BTW, Milhous,

It all depends on a couple upcoming bills: HR1 and S1. If these fail, and the current state legislatures obey their own voting laws, the way will be paved for Trump or DeSantis to run and win due to far less corruption of the process.

If the above bills pass, then it'll be pretty much lights out for the R's and my country.

The status quo in the USA were a bunch of totally corrupt bureaucrats. It took Trump to show us just how corrupt our government is...from top to bottom. Nobody, not Trump or anyone else, had an inkling how bad things are with the powers that be in the USA.

He tried to drain the swamp, but even he had no idea how bad things were here. The rule of law is a joke. Totally one sided. Justice is not blind. Our representative constitutional republic is in horrible shape, and getting much worse in a very rapid manner under the people who're pulling Biden's strings.

If the laws are not enforced equally, without prejudice, we're doomed to fail...and that's where we're heading under the swamp that runs the USA.

Biden runs nothing. Biden is run by the swamp...and he's so stupid he doesn't even realize it.