Member Info for FBT1

https://us10.campaign-archive.com/?u=7308e48183fe2c7115020bca5&id=e54fe76d86

Large Buy order.

I’ve never seen this before on the BBC Academy website, and has never come up in a search before. Maybe old, but only just released. BBC normally very secretive about the technology they use, so maybe the POC has been a success, and they can now talk about it. Who knows. IMHO.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/production/television/production-management/article/art20131025101349201

Someone quietly building up a position. Mind you share price marked down, so maybe a seller out there as well.

Who knows.

Yes just noticed that. No trades to indicate why. I believe it was offered at 4.96 earlier, showing as sells. Maybe there is a large buy order being filled, and we will see it later. Interesting.

Your not alone. Milton Group added 15 million shares at 10p to their existing holdings. The new CEO just bought £41k worth of shares. They must know something we don't.

Continued.... I think Stephen Streater calls the tune here and, as I say, probably due to fears of breaching the collaboration deal with what we assume is Apple then we won't get one. My conclusion is that FBT are in lock down because of confidentiality clauses. I also think there is a good chance of a commercial POC contract. That's based on the fact they have in effect confirmed they a) continue to integrate Forscene with the major consumer company product and b) that the prospect of a commercial deal remains based on the criterion that cost saving for the BBC from the workflow is achieved. If I am wrong then I have to say FBT have lied to me and have breached Aim Regulations by not announcing changes to publicly declared information. I don't believe they would take that risk as they know the implications and their director obligations. It's clear that something enticed Ian McDonough to join and probably part of the head hunting tick list included strong contacts with the BBC. I do think they could handle things differently by getting across the message that they are under extreme confidentiality clauses. But, who knows, maybe there is an Apple confidentiality clause restricting them saying that !!

Interesting read from ADVFN thread. nick2412: As far as getting communication from the Company on public domain issues, well it is like getting blood out of a stone. I took the view that it's either because things like the POC are not going to go ahead hence the Company's reticence or it's because it is progressing and extreme confidentiality clauses are in place. To try and test which one I took all the public domain statements about the POC and wrote to the Company to state that I am relying on these statements and directors have responsibility for them. The Company confirmed that it is adhering to AIM regulations and Ian McDonough said he is meeting with all the various clients, project contacts including the POC. Jonathan Lees said there was no change to existing public domain guidance. I'll put another post up later on which states what I am relying on i.e the specific FBT public domain statements. These include the POC rns and a transcript of an interview Aziz conducted with Proactive Investors. These sources include the statement that FBT are integrating Forscene with the major consumer partner product (I assume Apple Final Cut). Well the Company have said 'no change' and by implication no change to those statements. I lean towards the view that Aziz was far too forthcoming for the 'major consumer's' liking in both the rns and the interview and they reminded and firmed up extremely restrictive confidentiality terms. I'll post up the interview transcript with Proactive and the rns and but, in short, I used FBT's words about the agreed Forescene product integration with the major consumer company and the fact that the criterion for a resulting commercial deal was cost savings for the UK broadcaster. I reminded them that Aziz had put on the public record that the criterion for a deal with the factual department of the UK broadcaster (with the expectation that it was to be extended out) was cost saving. In other words the implication is if FBT plus partner pass the designated test a commercial deal will result. I also reminded them that I was relying on the statement that Forescene was being integrated with the major consumers offering to this client (BBC of course) and the resulting integrated product would be offered by the major consumer company to its clients. In short I told them if there was any change to this they were obligated under AIM Regulations to inform. I was advised by Jonathan Lees there was no change and Aim Regulations were being followed and similarly by Ian McDonough. To be fair to Ian, he has just started and he confirmed to me he intends to make the business a success and he is in the process of meeting key clients. I get the impression he would be much more forthcoming if he were allowed to. The fact he isn't maybe for good reason or paranoia of losing the potential POC deal on SS's part. Ian also wrote that he would consider my suggestion to do an investor presentation evening. I think Stephen Streater calls the tun

http://www.forbidden.co.uk/2017/09/19/pop-up-cloud-infrastructure/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MWqzNQt_IJk

Trades.

Huge potential. That's why Miton Group added another 15 million shares at 10p to their existing holdings. New CEO just bought £40k worth of shares. The industry is heading towards the cloud, so FBT are in a prime position. IMHO.

For everyone else, get involved today while we still have a 5 handle. IMHO.

Shylock. Why do you need comforting, your not even invested. His bought a load of shares anyway. How much comforting do people want.

Bore off.

Shylock. I worked for an investment bank for 16 years trading equity options & futures. I know the changes that came into place post financial crises. His options will be vested for a minimum 3 years. The whole point of that is to discourage short term decisions for short term gains. IMHO.

Shylock. Never assume. It will minimum 3 years. IMHO.

Minimum 3 years. IMHO.