Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Why do people think they have a right not to be upset?
Striking deals is the easy bit, what matters is the benefits gained from such deals. If I was JP I would not want the Cobre major client deal nor the Tatu deal on my CV showing how good my track record was in making deals.
Hey Falkland how is your forecast of 10p for Rockhopper(RKH) going? Did I read on that board that you said you were never wrong?
DVH: We were NOT all making money from a health SP, only those who sold out. The ones who remained thought that there were decent prospects and could trust the BOD, clearly we were let down. No matter how hard the Ramper clique shout the prospects no longer appear to be decent and the BOD have lost trust. The inaction of the BOD would suggest that all is well when it is obvious to anyone that it is not.
That depends on how they see the company progressing under the present leadership and what is offered in a takeover bid. The current stagnation does not fill me with a great deal of confidence in the BOD's judgement/ability to turn the co. around nor fulfil their promises.
If you are the "major client" perhaps you could buy SML, sell off all the assets, renegotiate Cobre and end up with all the Magnetite you need - maybe even make a profit out of the deal.
The Cobre product, as any other product, is only worth what someone is prepared to pay for it. What efforts are the BOD making to sell the product of which we must now have a very large pile sitting doing nothing? Is it that there is no market or is the BOD not trying hard enough to overcome their poor judgement?
The BOD clearly made a huge mistake over this "major customer" contract, did they not know that the customer could not fulfil their side of the contract because they did not have the required environmental permissions and that if they defaulted we could realistically do nothing about it except jump up and down and cry? How do we (PI shareholders) know that this unknown company had any intention of sticking to it's side of the contract? What has it cost them so far, the forfeited product? Could it be that it is in the defaulter's interest to force our share price down to make a takeover cheap?
Why does the BOD not name this "major customer"?
Falkland: Are you able to put a date, to within a century or two will do, when the wealth of all the countries in the world will have fallen to below the current wealth of the Falklands?
Can someone with a lot more experience/knowledge than me explain the purpose of the share buy back? I can't see any benefit being gained from spending the large sums of money. Surely the sp should go up when the number of shares goes down? All I see is the value of my holding going down.
Can you explain the prices shown. I thought that the Share Price was the mid price between the Bid and Ask. The prices shown would indicate that the Mid should be 211.9. The rise on yesterday's close would therefore be 0.85%. Am I missing something here?
The Placement RNS stated that the money was required not only for Redmore but also for LCCM. My understanding of the promises from the BoD has been that we were fully funded by Cobre without the "Cobre major client". Why then did we need to raise money from a Placing to fund the LCCM project? When were we informed that we could no longer fund the development of LCCM from internal revenues? This situation must put the future plans and timescales to large profits from LCCM into doubt. When the £4M does not arrive how are we going to afford litigation?
We do not actually have this mythical major client, what we have is a promise from an anonymous entity to give us £4M at an unspecified time in the future for product which sits in our yard that we cannot sell. Strikes me that we are being kept dangling on a piece of string for someone else's benefit.
I hope my fears are wrong but this is AIM and promises do not buy a crust.
Am I missing something but when/if the contract is resumed do we owe the client $1.125M worth of product before any more payments need to be paid to us?
I would be in favour of a 2nd Referendum. What is important is not the holding of one but the question being asked. We have had one which produced a leave majority, both main political parties stood for election to honour that result. The problem now is that they will not follow through on that commitment choosing instead to invent any reason they can think of to justify why they are acting in the best interests of the country. We have already decided to leave all that is in question is how. This can all be resolved by asking the electorate how we should leave the EU in a legally binding referendum - the deal on offer or no deal.
A lot of propaganda has been used by both sides of the claims, forecasts, lies etc. put forward during the referendum to justify their arguments, in particular the Remain side was keen to tell us how badly it would affect our future generations if we left and it would all be our fault. I can not remember seeing any forecasts etc. of what things would be like in 20 odd years time if we remained in the EU with the policy and inexorable movement towards the United States of Europe when every aspect of our lives would be controlled by faceless civil servants from behind closed doors.
127000 for 1.627 at 12:54hrs. is definitely a buy not a sell.
USA - The best democracy money can buy.
I think it is time we revoked their independence as they seem unable to elect a proper governing body.
Maybe the UN should put a peace keeping force in to prevent further bloodshed, more gunshot deaths than in Iraq.
I do not recognise your statement "few posts and many sells is the norm." That sounds like the normal fake news of the derampers.
Very unusual that there are no posts since Saturday! Is this yet another glitch on this site?
I can remember standing in the dole queue in the seventies listening to people bragging that "we showed 'em comrade". It's a shame that people have such short memories that they can't remember who put us all in that queue and who got us out of it. People will believe anyone who promises to give them jam today and doesn't tell them that the cost is starvation tomorrow.
"Who wants this rubbish anyway?" Believe it or not but the Company you claim to financially support wants it even if many of the employees dislike handling it. If you are going to "put it back in the box" do you think that will solve your psychological hang up? I do presume that you put it in an envelope addressed to the sender and not just burden RMG with it and the Posties who have to move it a second time. Sounds pretty irresponsible to me. Do you put any more of your recycling in the post box?