RE: Build Up To Capital Markets Day11 Jun 2026 14:06
Yes,apparently that was because ConserV Bioscience maintained a much broader pipeline of independent assets that Imutex had absolutely no right to or financial stake in..
hVIVO held a 49% indirect stake in Imutex Limited. Therefore, hVIVO essentially had a 49% stake only in the FLU-v and AGS-v programs.None of the other active projects listed—such as the UNICOR-v pan-coronavirus vaccine, the HIV program, or the Chagas disease targets—were ever part of Imutex. They belonged strictly to ConserV Bioscience’s independent, proprietary pipeline.By restructuring the deal and swapping its 49% share of Imutex for a 10% direct share capital holding in ConserV Bioscience, hVIVO successfully traded away its high concentration in just two assets to get a smaller piece of all 10 vaccine programs ConserV is currently working on.Would you like to know more about the clinical trial timelines for either FLU-v or AGS-v, or should we look at how hVIVO’s financial reports reflected this equity shift?AI responses may include mistakes. Learn morehVIVO (DB:CRO) - Earnings & Revenue Performance - Simply Wall StSimply Wall StreetPoolbeg Pharma Share Chat. Chat About POLB Shares - London South EastLondon South EastThe UK's favourite investor portal.