We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Today I cease to hold Prudential after many unexciting but profitable years. In my opinion they are simply cosying up to the Chinese authorities. Perhaps that is the only way forward; perhaps it will be successful; but it does not smell right to me. Selling out of Taiwan; splitting of Jacksons; raising funds big-time in Honk Kong. I do not wish to support this board of directors any further.
Agree with you Lavenonews, but even a company such as this which seems to be run for the benefit of management might be a good investment. Going forward the stars are aligning nicely for Crestchic - pity about the name. Meanwhile any announcement about the disposal of Tasman could give rise to a surge of interest. Hope they have some sort of moat, but the next 12 months will be interesting.
Yes, my 34k buy is red. How and why do they do that? Is there no regulator? Looks a bit shady to me, but in the long term it’s irrelevant - value will out.
The emphasis now is very much on the US, but activities are worldwide. As for safety, who knows? What stands out is the ridiculous spread which means a purchase more than halves in ‘value’ immediately. This I suggest is highly damaging for the AIM market. Look elsewhere; U.K. Ltd is closed for business.
No news that I can see. Perhaps at last there are straws in the wind regarding splitting the agricultural side from robotic engineering. They are completely unsuited bedfellows, put off institutional buyers, and a split could easily increase the aggregate SP by 50%.
I’ve lost too much on these to be drawn in to add by today’s spike, but the technology could be proving itself to some insiders somewhere. The advantage - well one advantage - of flow technologies is the near 100% recyclability, which needs more emphasis imo. We are told the failing lithium batteries will be lumped together for off-grid storage, but that is only temporary. They will then comprise a toxic expanding heap of ... er dangerous waste.
Yes, but surely we are not talking about a new drug or invasive procedure, but an analysis by Parsortix of a simple blood test. Therefore I am puzzled that this should involve any rigorous evaluation. Put simply: if I wish to have my blood sample filtered by Parsortix and the result given to me, and will pay for it, then that’s my business surely... and a big business opportunity.
One assumes the lack of any financial details is due to the immaterial size of this particular order. On the other hand it is a vote of confidence, perhaps even the much hoped for breakthrough. My natural caution honed on many years of over optimism leads me to think we are still at the ‘little acorn’ stage, tho maybe a sign of a green shoot.
I don�t understand the bit about the Vanadium flow system �storing energy for up to four hours� whereas Lithium only manages one hour. On the face of it this is nonsense, so clearly my simpleton brain has missed something. My lithium powered toothbrush, and your Lexus, last one hell of a lot more than an hour. Could these be the times to lose 1% of charge, or something like that? Not a good rns to sow confusion, and degrades the good news imo as a long-term holder.