Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
@Wents
"You had the likes of Cj taking all this in,last week he would not give moon the time of day and ripping into him,yesterday with his cryptic messages he was conversing with him,just shows the gullibility and hypocrisy of cj. "
You are either unable to read, or just a p11llock
Just to be clear. I fully support the indigenous land owners having significant input on land usage.
The preservation of traditional, historic, religeous sites is of utmost importance. Inded the destruction by RIO of a 40000 year old area with wall paintings was appauling.
However with the new and dare I say excessive power. Farmers and domestic house owners were being prohibitted from keeping paultry and other highly restrictive prohibitions.
The new found power went to their heads and not untipical of all humans they over played their hand.
The referendum was very decisive to restore a balance of preservation and progress.
We are not on lide support yet.
We urgently need DMIRS to give permission. Then all the nay sayers will sudenly tell us thay always had faith etc..
To be fair to the BOD, who have handled things badly., The delay in approval has been soley down to the Aus. Govmt. giving ludicrous power to indiginous land owners. It took a referendum last Oct. to get decisions back with the grown ups.
Up 23% at the close.
The Friday news has been rationalised and the removal of the possibility of running out of funds taken off the table.
The market appears to now focus on the tremendous potential of this company. Both near term and long.
Great news for LTHs
I think it is fair to say that the only serious worry was that we could become insolvent before the DMIRS permission.
The loan facility, undesireable as it was, has given a clear >12 month runway to permission and subsequent revenue stream.
I see no real concerns for the forseable future. The bottom is in :-)