Member Info for ChaseTheBag

What are the drill hole numbers that have been punched into the 0-800m level that aren’t included in MRE2 that support your point?

@Hydro
I’m talking purely about the main pipe between the levels 0-800m, the top of the EB is 850m and is outside of the main pipe. I’m not here to disturb let’s have a serious discussion. Between 0-800 which includes EVERY drill hole in those depths we have c70mt when it should be 600mt. Are you able to explain this?

@bamps
I’m sorry I mean no malice in my posts but you did not explain at all where the missing 600mt is.. your response of ‘I know but I’m not telling anyone’ highlights infact that you have no clue just the same as me!

Paddy produced an MRE in August 2020 in which he calculated 7Moz to a depth of 600m, his tonnage was significantly out so I’m not the only one confused with the missing tonnage. (Not a jab at Paddy I enjoy his posts).

@Bamps21, Do you think there is significant resource growth potential in the levels 0-800m?

If the answer is YES then please show me which drill holes in these levels can add to the tonnage.

The answer I believe will be NO. GGP included every drill hole to date between the levels 0-1000m and only produced 78mt??

There is 600mt missing, and nobody has an answer?

*specific gravity of 3 was used
*deposit widens 800-1000m but not enough for 600mt

Hi bamps thank you for your reply, I know your knowledge is superior to mine but I believe you are incorrect with your statement. In the GGP RNS there is a table that shows we have 45mt in the SE crescent and 33mt in the Breccia. If the missing 600mt is going to the included in the bulk mining why wouldn’t GGP include it in their resource update as this would increase the recourse by multiples? I really feel like the missing tonnage needs to be discussed more on the board, has it been excluded due to insufficient drilling density? Below cut off grade? Non mineralised areas? Either way it’s bothering me

From GGP’s ore reserve update we can calculate the following, 78mt @ c2g/t to a depth of approximately 1000m below cover giving a gold equivalent of 5.9Moz.
To the depth of 1000m the tonnage is 680mt, where is the missing 600mt? Has it been left out because of cut off grades? Is this tonnage not mineralised? I understand a small portion of the tonnage will be put into future resource updates but if you look at the diagrams there isn’t a lot of resource growth potential between the depths 0-800m they seem to have found the boundaries. Below 800m the deposit is wide open. Can someone please help me to understand, I appreciate any response.

I do find it odd that their contract runs until October 2022 but SD stated in the recent interview they expect to reach the orebody Q4 2023. Any thoughts on this?

Hydro, any chance you could share your prediction for the AISC? IMO the market will be pricing in $800-1000, anything above this and we will get crushed. I’m expecting $600 range but then again who knows until we know.

The market seems to be pricing in a $800-1000 AISC based on current market cap and known resource. Sub $800 AISC for the ‘fast start’ will really put the cat amongst the pigeons.

Thanks for sophisticated reply zoros, I appreciate it. Everyone wants the SP to move but nobody realises that the biggest catalyst is reaching the orebody.

I’ve been invested here 18 months and extremely bullish on GGP. Why am I being crucified for highlighting the progress of the decline that is stated in the RNS? Please do correct me if I’m wrong. Posters are being called ‘divs’ for stating facts from the RNS..

1m per day is a really poor pace on the decline. Amazing results but that has put a damper on things.

Upgraded target price from 26p-29p. The upgrade was 2 weeks ago so I apologise if this has already been posted.

154m per month takes us 18 months to reach the orebody. Can’t see us being in before Christmas but hope I’m wrong! I’d also like to remind people there will be a tolling cost to GGP for the use of the Telfer processing plant, just something to consider when doing your own calculations.

I’ve just fallen out of my chair calculating the tonnage at Havieron. To save myself being laughed at by the BB can you post your calculations please.
At 1g/t it gives silly numbers.. I’m very confident Havieron will surpass 1 billion tonnes. When will the market wake up?

Times like these is what separates your profitable investor from your average chump. If you can’t watch your investment lose 50% of its value then you shouldn’t be playing this game.

I’m glad the market hasn’t realised the value of Havieron yet, it allows me to top up at ridiculously low prices. Not enough people on this BB understand how bright the future is for GGP.

Decide if your an investor or an average chump then act accordingly.

Spymaster25 on the 2nd June 2020 you posted that your ‘source’ believes Hav will be 30Moz Au excluding copper, now you’re berating people for talking about those kind of figures...
Guessing your ‘source’ changed his mind on the 30Moz;)

Hi joe, just wondering if you still stand by your previous comments regarding SWAG. Genuine question no malice intended.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GWgGNYtY__k

GH interview 2-3 weeks before Scallywag drilling commenced. At 7:05-7:30 notice how he states they planned to drill Scallywag, PRE and BH before the drilling season ends in December. He stated being able to drill all of the targets would depend on “time and results as we go along”. They finished drilling Scallywag roughly November 1st giving them give circa 5 weeks to drill PRE. Not starting drilling at PRE given they had plenty of time is a huge indication Scallywag is a hit. GH said fulfilling the drilling programme would depend on time and results, time wasn’t the reason they stopped drilling..

Hello Spy, Unlike some others I love reading your cryptic clues. Just wondering if the latest clue is related to Callum’s meat and veg if you know what I mean;) (3 ore bodies). If I am wrong please can you post another clue lol.