Member Info for Bodembel

IIRC, the Agronomics' Middle Eastern ventures are all in their planning phase if not still under negotiation. There are no factories yet. Therefore, no dozens of employees on the payroll of a factory that can not run. The damage is in the delay of the plans, not in cash outflows, which would have been much worse.

You seem concerned about JM personal wealth. It has been reported that he owns large estates in Germany and Isle of Man, as well as some personal residences in Brussels, Scotland and the US. However, I can find nothing that links him to real estate in the Middle East. What exactly are you referring to?

@charliemoonhead , there is no manual for the exact definition of Buy and Sell on this website, but I believe your understanding is correct. Suppose the current Bid is 5 and the current Ask is 7. Imagine a seller comes in with a limit at 6 and one second later a buyer comes in with a limit at 6 too. So, there will be a trade and it is labelled as 'Buy'. Now, suppose that the buyer was one second earlier, the trade is labelled as a 'Sell'. It's quite random really. I don't know why this website is labelling the trades as such. The official LSE site does not do that.

If someone has any solid research showing outperformance or any other advantage of this way of labelling, I would love to read it.

Https://www.instagram.com/p/DQOfYQckd_A/?img_index=2

Let's note here that Solein is not an end product. It's an ingredient which provides proteins and helps with texture. The end-product manufacturer will add other ingredients to determine the taste. In this case oat milk for the latte.

So, if this coffee is not appealing and tasty, it is not necessarily the fault of Solein. Actually, I am a bit worried about this promotion, besides the oat milk, also the coffee is partly plant based: beanless coffee made from upcycled rice and chickpeas. It does not sound appetizing to me, but hopefully I am proven wrong.

The share price of Beyond Meat Inc went down more than 50% on Monday. Beyond Meat is trying to lower its debt burden. Existing bondholders were offered new notes with a later maturity date plus Beyond Meat shares in compensation. The resulting dilution crashed the share price.

Perhaps short sellers took note of the above, concluded that the sector is not doing well and shorted ANIC. It's just my hypothesis for the dip of the last two days in ANIC's share price. On closer scrutiny, they would learn that Beyond Meat's products are all plant-based meat alternatives. ANIC left this path already a few years ago in favor of cultivated meat. The misfortunes of Beyond Meat are irrelevant to predicting ANIC's future.

To be honest, I found the headline numbers disappointing with only 1.6% revenue growth. Only after reading the Annual Report, I regained my confidence. The decrease in Contract Manufacturing revenue is not really a concern, since it is low-margin business. The decrease in Branded Products could be partly explained by the strategic cancellation of some under-performing brands. I found these and other explanations in the report acceptable. I still support the current strategy and the board and management executing it. I am not selling any share.

It is possible that other investors found the headline numbers disappointing, but did not read the annual report for a wider perspective. Instead, they just sold off their position. Actually, a lot of investors do not read the annual report. A strong presentation by management may reach a wider audience and stop the fall of the share price.

This still raises the question why the owner of an automated system would want to sell 1 share at a time.

It's quite annoying when you are trying to buy. I got filled with one share on a larger bid once and had to pay 3 GBP commission on it, since that's the minimum commission that Interactive Brokers charges and there were no other sellers under my price limit.

Every share that is bought is at the same time sold and vice versa. There can not be a different number of buys than there were sells. Hence, the Buys and Sells numbers you see here must be some derivative statistic specifically defined for this website. For example, Yahoo Finance does not show any such numbers.

I could not find any manual or FAQ on this website, so I am going to make a guess what Buys and Sells means. If anybody can correct me, please do so. When a trade is done with the last known Ask price, it counts as a Buy. When a trade is done at the last Bid price, it counts as a Sell. A lot of Buys suggest a bullish trend while a lot of Sells signal a bearish trend.

In this way, Buys and Sell seem to be intended to reflect the overall sentiment for the day. However, it can also be misleading. For example, when a new seller comes in with a limit price below the existing Ask which is also the latest price done. When a new buyer accepts that lower price, the trade counts as a Buy. This Buy counts towards the bullish trend, however the price just dropped.

Note that I am answering your question based on an assumption on what Buys and Sells means on this site. By definition, these must be somewhat concocted numbers and I would not attach too much value to them.

Could it be that some funds are not allowed to invest in AIM shares due to their mandate?

Every share that is bought is at the same time sold and vice versa. There can not be a different number of buys than there were sells. Hence, the Buys and Sells numbers you see here must be some derivative statistic specifically defined for this website. For example, Yahoo Finance does not show any such numbers.

I could not find any manual or FAQ on this website, so I am going to make a guess what Buys and Sells means. If anybody can correct me, please do so. When a trade is done with the last known Ask price, it counts as a Buy. When a trade is done at the last Bid price, it counts as a Sell. A lot of Buys suggest a bullish trend while a lot of Sells signal a bearish trend.

In this way, Buys and Sell seem to be intended to reflect the overall sentiment for the day. However, it can also be misleading. For example, when a new seller comes in with a limit price below the existing Ask which is also the latest price done. When a new buyer accepts that lower price, the trade counts as a Buy. This Buy counts towards the bullish trend, however the price just dropped.

Note that I am answering your question based on an assumption on what Buys and Sells means on this site. By definition, these must be somewhat concocted numbers and I would not attach too much value to them.

More news from Mosa Meat. You can buy its shares directly through an upcoming crowdfunding campaign:

https://mosameat.com/invest

A milestone at Mosa Meat too...

https://mosameat.com/blog/submitting-our-first-eu-market-authorisation-request

Welcome back Matador ! I will have a look at Pantheon Resources.

Yes, I had the same experience with IBKR. The ANIC share does not trade continuously. You may want to read: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/equities-trading/asset-classes/shares-trading/setsqx-and-seaq

I don't know how users of other brokers are able to trade ANIC continuously. Maybe those brokers are connected to a different source of liquidity? In any case, with some patience you can buy ANIC through IBKR just fine. I just set my limit price in the morning before the opening auction and went on with my day. I sometimes adjusted my bid just before those time points mentioned in the link above, for example when I noticed that I didn't get filled because the price was running away from my bid.

I think they only apply a depreciation on the value of Emma Hardie in the goodwill accounting. I don't think they will be winding down the brand operationally. Unless you got that from another source than the press release?