The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
Maybe you should have another look, dibs (15k posts?? Seriously?). I'm sure your seasoned engineering eye will.provide you some further dopey thing to say, but the line looks pretty complete to me, with ample space for a 2nd.
Wow, you're nothing but a thin-skinned bully, huh nobby? The second anyone pushes back on your pompous proclamations, who shows they know as much or more about this company than you do, or points out errors like your ridiculous exaggeration of what I'd written about the company delivering its first panel, you just avoid the issue at hand completely and instead accuse your opponent of being a company shill or a multiple avatar, etc. Foxy and I are as different as we are unfamiliar with each other. The only thing you can guarantee we share is the conviction that you have 2 completely unnecessary letters at the end of your nickname.
Mate, you're getting spittle all over this poor message board. You look forward to my credibility being 'blown out of the water'?? What kind of blithering nonsense are you prattling about now? All I wrote - and I'm more than happy to put my credibility up against your foaming-at-the-mouth on this - was that it was far more LIKELY that they would ship their first panel by this month-end than your convenient conclusion that it won't be until Q1 next year. I reckon that gives me most of the next 6 weeks to be safely onside. Meantime: when were you fired and was it for cause or just because you kept screaming at colleagues for no apparent reason?
You've got my blood up again, resistance. I only referred to the bulk of his post(s) as gobbledygook, neglecting to point out, as you have, it was gibberish in aid of trying to backpedal and outlandishly pretend like he isn't aware of headline news such as this and then to try and paint himself as some kind of deeply spiritual figure unable to comprehend the horrors of war. Instead of just fessing up to being a commonplace hateful tool.
1. The US didn't 'declare war' after 9/11, huh? Tell that to the Iraqis. 2. the shekel weakness is largely a positive for the company as is the likely increase in cyber spend by the government and 3. the gobbledygook that constitutes the remainder of that useless post does nothing to push back on the idea that you're a poisonous pos
I'll bet you agonised over that for hours, didn't you, dartron? "Let's see, how can I design a quick comment that allows me to rub it in the face of the guys who are mean to me that BATM's sp is down hard, without me seeming to be a shameless ghoul who knows full well this was due to a horrible, unimaginable event that was not only unforeseeable but likely won't even impact the Company economically." Years of posting on these godforsaken message boards, and I don't think I've ever seen such a soulless attempt to use a tragic event to try and troll a bunch of strangers who you think don't like you. The US market crashed after 9-11. Did you write then about how that was an example of 'regional risk' too? You're beneath contempt.
Israeli market was open today and BATM traded down in line with the index to the equivalent of 24.3p on 40k shares, around -6% on our Friday close. Not a surprising knee-jerk reaction considering the conflict, but I think even the most bearish fundamental view for the company is that, at worst, this should be neutral for BATM as its logical to assume that in a time of war, the last thing a government is going to do is cut cybersecurity spending. In fact, I think it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that this awful development is more likely to result in an increase in engagement with the government than see any kind of cut. Hopefully, the Shore Cap analyst will come out tomorrow morning with similar comments.
'people you've spoken to in the City.....'?!? Seriously? Are they different from the people you speak to in your head??
And a final observation, as it may be a further small reassurance, during an auditor-delayed suspension such as this one, ECOB could of course not simply sack PKF and hire a new accounting firm. Besides the terrible message that would send (fair or not), that's a big no-no for AIM no matter how incompetently the audit firm may have behaved. If I'm right and this is as it seems a PKF-induced mess, ECOB will be stuck with them until the audit is complete and re-listing occurs. Even then, I think there is a standstill period required after re-listing before said auditor can finally be sacked.