Member Info for beginerman

May have been conservative for you Pdub, but your post did contain quite a few if this / if that happens! But of course was your opinion. Let us all hope your crystal ball proves correct.

HmHG, the headmaster has spoken! He requires your essay to substantiate your comment, better get started or you could be up for some form of punishment, possibly a demeaning word or two.. Not sure you are too bothered though.

@mtb, and will these thousands of new jobs in the PublicSector come with final salary pensions that the poor private sector taxpayers will have to help pay for along with the usual cost of public sector inefficiencies.

@Daisydog, it may be that people do not believe all the positivity that is posted here, possibly thinking that it smacks of desperation from too many “all in” holders

So we are now grasping at the straws of Russian sanctions. Itwouldbe good news if BMN could provide the good news themselves

Pdub, hypothetical ! You mean like your positivity posts ? Oh yes you can make those statements as you always say “in my opinion” . Now run along and please do your best to be polite, as your arrogance and bad manners do you little favour.

More cheese please, well done, you are correct. However you word it a balanced view is important

Pb940, many thanks.

pb940, that seems a logical consideration, hopefully correct. Thanks.

Oh and Pdub You have used the word balance! I didnt know you knew the meaning of the word. Now toggle off and compose your next post to draw in more investors with your unbalanced positivity.

So Pdub you cannot fully answer my question, or wont

Does anyone know if the facility is on track for its original completion date. Also was the contract a fixed price on a design and build basis, if not the risk of increased costs, risks within the ground and insolvencies within the supply chain will rest with BMN. Additional costs could be substantial if the contract was not buttoned down. Positivity should always be tempered with potential risks.

Loudspeaker, only four primary vanadium mines outside of China to supply the massive demand of VRFB manufacturers, military and steel producers. What I fail to grasp is given this: why is the sp at this level, and why have not a large plc miner instigated a takeover? Something doesn’t seem to stack up as surely it cannot be only the posters on this BB who see the potential.

Uk, I think it means the sp is doing sweet fanny Adam’s, but it sounds better.

Cindercone, the company brokers are similar to long term heavily invested holders - they only want to declare the positives.

Correction: MVP should have read MCP.

MVP, a small amount in this and one other. My main holdings from which I gain my income is within a range of international funds. I held Bmn a few years ago and sold for a small profit, buying in again later for an interest. Funds do not feature, as far as I am aware on this BB hence why my comments are predominantly on BMN. I am a cautious investor and as such spread my risk, I sleep tight and live well, not being greedy.

Eat stocks, good to read your response, however your response to my question could be considered very naive, but hey everyone has an opinion and I try not to be belittling them or be rude, unlike many appear to be on this over sensitive bullion board, but perhaps the stress of holding BMN brings out the worse in some people.

Hintza, I would also add that the “effort that I put in” is of no effort to me at all, it is minuscule in comparison to the effort that some holders put in to shore up or ramp the share ( take your pick) it seems to almost almost borders on a full time job - why would this be so I wonder.

Hintza, you are entitled to your views, but not interested in your advise thanks.