Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
@Daisydog, it may be that people do not believe all the positivity that is posted here, possibly thinking that it smacks of desperation from too many “all in” holders
So we are now grasping at the straws of Russian sanctions. Itwouldbe good news if BMN could provide the good news themselves
Pdub, hypothetical ! You mean like your positivity posts ? Oh yes you can make those statements as you always say “in my opinion” . Now run along and please do your best to be polite, as your arrogance and bad manners do you little favour.
More cheese please, well done, you are correct. However you word it a balanced view is important
Pb940, many thanks.
pb940, that seems a logical consideration, hopefully correct. Thanks.
Oh and Pdub You have used the word balance! I didnt know you knew the meaning of the word. Now toggle off and compose your next post to draw in more investors with your unbalanced positivity.
So Pdub you cannot fully answer my question, or wont
Does anyone know if the facility is on track for its original completion date. Also was the contract a fixed price on a design and build basis, if not the risk of increased costs, risks within the ground and insolvencies within the supply chain will rest with BMN. Additional costs could be substantial if the contract was not buttoned down. Positivity should always be tempered with potential risks.
Loudspeaker, only four primary vanadium mines outside of China to supply the massive demand of VRFB manufacturers, military and steel producers. What I fail to grasp is given this: why is the sp at this level, and why have not a large plc miner instigated a takeover? Something doesn’t seem to stack up as surely it cannot be only the posters on this BB who see the potential.
Uk, I think it means the sp is doing sweet fanny Adam’s, but it sounds better.
Cindercone, the company brokers are similar to long term heavily invested holders - they only want to declare the positives.
Correction: MVP should have read MCP.
MVP, a small amount in this and one other. My main holdings from which I gain my income is within a range of international funds. I held Bmn a few years ago and sold for a small profit, buying in again later for an interest. Funds do not feature, as far as I am aware on this BB hence why my comments are predominantly on BMN. I am a cautious investor and as such spread my risk, I sleep tight and live well, not being greedy.
Eat stocks, good to read your response, however your response to my question could be considered very naive, but hey everyone has an opinion and I try not to be belittling them or be rude, unlike many appear to be on this over sensitive bullion board, but perhaps the stress of holding BMN brings out the worse in some people.
Hintza, I would also add that the “effort that I put in” is of no effort to me at all, it is minuscule in comparison to the effort that some holders put in to shore up or ramp the share ( take your pick) it seems to almost almost borders on a full time job - why would this be so I wonder.
Hintza, you are entitled to your views, but not interested in your advise thanks.
Tech, that is a possibility, and I hope it is or there will be a lot of disappointed holders on this Bb as so many here seem to be “all in”
Bmn does show some promise but at a risk, which is why I only have a small holding. Why when we see all of the positives being continually detailed by certain long term holders do their followers not question why if these positives were so true that the share price has not risen by now. Perhaps BMN is not the certainty that they are leading people to believe and more professional investors are leaving alone.
Correction. It should have read “ by some who appear to be egotistical etc… Appologies