Member Info for bassman72

Must be about a year since he that calls himself Laura first posted with all the usual "oversold""buys showing as sells" nonsense and posting irrelevant live information, and since then the stock has dropped, lets see... oh, 75% despite his apparent "top-ups". Brave little Cav - who made trades that apparently didn't appear on *any* share register got suckered in, adamant there was no pump and dump "the naysayers will eat their words!", and still doesn't understand that calling averaging down "topping up" does not make it a positive thing😂.

Once again Mr Laura has smothered and manipulated a stock, killed all credibility and gone onto the next low liquidity mess ("oversold!""buys showing as sells!" "green boxes!" with fools following being used as exit liquidity. Some learn and accept their loss and know not to follow him again. Some laugh as he threatens to call the police about posts, or states the FCA is tracking IP addresses 😂. This shows you the intelligence of those that follow him 😂. Really, over 18k manipulative posts, including live data and doesn't get banned. Funny that.

Also beware people who say Institutions selling is a good thing "to give retail a chance" 😂.

Am guessing no buys showing as sells today? What happened to the "strong momentum" proactive investors mentioned? 🤔. Down nearly 10% since then, and soon back to placing price 🫣

Current market share in UK defence consultancy? We are sub one percent.

What proportion of sales comes from your largest customer? 25-30%.

Dodged the question about have other founders sold...

"Burnrate changes every month" "no *current* plan for any future raise"

Is there really no-one else here watching this?

Anyone else watching? What defines a contract as "lumpy"?

Yep no "buys as sells" there. A £45k sell. And Cav thought 7k was a lot...

Forget that "overhang" nonsense - no such thing here. I suspect someone has just seen the data we're about to see. GLA

Words, humble pie...

I think that after all the food-related revenge fantasies Cav has treated us to, it's finally time to "green box", as he who calls himself laura would say.

At this point, the claim that "the fact remains that more people thought it was a good idea to buy today" is difficult to defend with a straight face 😂. "More buys than sells" works by number of shares, not number of trades, right? Confusing the spelling of cavalier is one thing; claiming to have a trade that "just didn't show up" on any exchange, then insinuate she bought on a foreign exchange,as if that wouldn't show up 😂. Then there's the refusal to acknowledge a pump-and-dump she's apparently cannot see, followed by the sudden silence and newfound civility when Pedro61 switched sides, the snippy, mealymouthed "humblepie" hopeful posts, interspersed with obvious copypasta either sent to her, or from linked-in. I am genuinely wondering if Cav is a bot with a rather well-defined personality. Having said that, a bot would not have confused cavilier/cavalier as 2 different things.

My point is that Cav is entertaining, but ultimately a distraction. Whether she's deliberately running interference or is genuinely this naive and defensive is beside the point. The real issue is the regular character who repeatedly appears in low-liquidity stocks, has a long history of being exposed here and elsewhere for attempted stock promotion, and poses a genuine risk to inexperienced investors.

Nobody is going to lose money because of Cav's outbursts or copypasta. The focus should remain on he that calls himself Laura, why he repeatedly turns up on illiquid stocks, how he appears able to post live data without moderation issues, and how someone with 18,000+ posts continues to follow the same pattern... The moment he turned up here "oversold!", "buys showing as sells!""green boxes" "heard on telegram..."it was obvious the fix was in, pump and dumps (at least 3 of them) liquidity issues etc. Criticism of this character appears seems to get deleted surprisingly quickly, while he also posts about calling the police, and apparently even being told the FCA is "logging IPs" and criminal action being prepared. Oh, the irony 😂. Lets see how long this post lasts...

Add to this the character that posted that institutional selling was a good thing as it "gave retail investors a chance" 😂 and you see why lse is having to rely on more and more pop-up advertising as subscriptions vanish...

Oh bless you Cav, its not just the number of trades, its the size of them 😂. None of the sells are under £1k, most of the buys are under £8. Even blokecalledLAura isn't posting his idiotic "buys are showing as sells"!

You are most definitely not the laughing cavalier 😂.

Sudden drop on the day of a webinar, eh? Looks like someone has already seen the info and is bailing out... WHen do the "naysayers eat their words"?

Do we think another placing is on the way?

Remember when Cav was averaging down she stated she didn't mind people using her as exit liquidity as it was only a "small amount". I'm not really sure she's cut out for investing 😂.

I think its worth re-stating that Cav actually posted that her trade had not shown up *at all on a day when there were only 6 trades, then tried to insinuate she'd bought it on a foreign exchange 😂 ... That pretty much says it all. That humble pie must be getting cold 😂. Its almost year now since Cav swooped in saying "naysayers will eat their words"

Stop this "total addressable market" nonsense. It has nothing to do with how the company is run, or the trouble its in.

Alas RCFX down over 90% in the last year, and as another poster said, all liquidity pumped and dumped from it by you know who...

A few observations:

The strongest statement

"Invoiced sales in April 2026 were 3x those achieved in September 2025."

This is the most concrete datapoint because it contains an actual measurable comparison. However, investors would immediately ask:

What were the sales figures in absolute terms?

Was September 2025 unusually weak?

Was April 2026 unusually strong due to timing of invoices?

Without the underlying numbers, "3x" sounds impressive but is hard to evaluate.

Positive but not yet revenue

"Substantial progress made towards a major framework agreement..."

and

"...a further Prime framework on track..."

Framework agreements are valuable because they can open doors to future work, but they are not guaranteed revenue. The market typically discounts framework announcements until actual contract awards start flowing through.

The missing information is:

Current cash position.

Order book value.

Revenue guidance.

Expected timing of framework awards.

Profitability or gross margin trends.

Those are the metrics that would help determine whether the commercial progress is translating into a sustainable business.

"Not far fetched" but this post was from a bloke who calls himself Laura, who has apparently previously called the police about posts on here and also stated that the FCA were tracing IP addresses. Irony does not mean "like iron", Cav. 😂.

Webinar should have been today at 14.30 but postponed this morning with 5 hrs notice....

Can't think why posts about this have been deleted? Even those by he who call himself Laura. Is there talk of another placing? Last time we expected 8p and it was 6p. Those who bought in at 6 would have done OK. As others have said, no liquidity left for the usual P&D action here...

Its strange - Cav's posts used to be full of snippy food-related comments about humble pie and eating words but now just pastes whatever she's been sent 😂. What happened to buys showing as sells? Or her buys apparently not showing up at all 😂. I think claiming her trade didn't show up at all is about all you need to know😂

Hasn't mentioned her other very successful investments lately either 🤔.

"The announcement contains strong headlines but limited hard financial detail. Investors are being asked to assume the contract wins will translate into meaningful revenue, profit, and cash flow improvements without seeing evidence yet."

Cable we’ve been through this so many times 😆. You make stuff up and go on about humble pie, eating words and various food related snippy comments, then when you are presented with your own posts as proof of your nonsense you change tack and go on about how sad people must be to go through your history 😆. You stated you’d bought in “well before joining this board” which puts you well underwater. You then “topped up” but said it wasn’t “averaging down”, and then that you didn’t mind being exit liquidity for traders as it was “only a small amount” so yep nearer 14. You realise bloke called Laura is a bloke, yes? There is no sororital solidarity here 😆 you just got caught on a pump and dump.

Cav stop being so obtuse. People invested a year ago as they believed in the company. They issued a profits warning and the share rightfully collapsed. You followed in and got stuck on one of blokecalledlauras pump and dumps. You are cherry picking from the placing price. Either way, you are still underwater as is clear from your posting history. Average of 14 I seem to remember, then you “topped up” at about 8. Keep track!

My 87p buy is showing as a sell 😆

“Moving on every buy” um. Only 5 of those buys are over £50 😆. Not sure they’ve said how much of that £18b investment will go to rcfx, have they?!

Stop this nonsense. Even Cav has stopped posting 😆

Cav does not consider herself a mug! Maybe a teacup