Member Info for AlgoMan

Just been emailed this...

https://www.change.org/my_dogs_have_more_shares

I popped into Lidl on the way home. Different high protein products, highly visible through the store. This combined with "norms" at work all talking about buying high protein products makes me think protein as a focus is hitting the mainstream quite hard. Big opportunity for sales, big opportunity to be taken out by a global player for the instant market access.

I understand he tends to frequent the Starbucks.

We have had many names like that (potentially often the same person returning). They have all eventually admitted that they were trading and looking for an entry. Soon went long and started pumping on a pullback.

The only thing that amazes me is that people think what you post on here impacts the price of a share like this. Some penny stock with a few hundred trades a day... Maybe... But not this.

In my eyes the brand is the value.

I am not saying this shouldn't be rescued by the way. I was just interested in the genuine WHY over random mystic meg predictions from the William Hill brigade.

Genuine question.

What is there to rescue?

Brand value? Which isn't planned to be used under the reward rate scheme?

Licensing? Which is dependent on covering a huge liability?

Genuine question, why rescue this over starting a new company? The people, infrastructure, equipment, ip, software are gone or going?

Who is Mike?

In my humble opinion as a business expert - Mick knows exactly what needs to be executed here, I would be really surprised if we were not sat here in 2024 looking at a £3+ share price. For me, with my history of making significant losses time after time, it's clear this is the turn around story of the 21st century. GLA, not that you need it. Nailed on.

Maybe it's just me but the fact NSF has a smaller market cap than a business that is in official wind down should raise some red flags. If it's too good to be true...

Loading in some dry powder ready

If they have cine in their name you know they are just a degenerate gambler like most of us 😜

Not even roulette, that is at least 50:50 or thereabouts.

Absolutely these people's credibility and this earning potential is tied to their past performance. They won't want their name being associated with anything that looks like a dud.

CitySky

Ha ha I literally just made the same joke on another thread.

They don't even exist.

Shouldn't be an issue, I worked for a business once that had 3 core businesses but about 10 shared service businesses that provided resources etc onto the core public facing elements. This isn't a public company though so less concern about accounting. Could get quite spicy if the support services are seen to be making a profit. Who owns them etc?

Interesting off book pre negotiated trades.

I would agree. But I also think it's a fascinating insight into how these papers operate and gives us as investors a feel for how much we should trust them.

Fascinating. Good on him for calling out there crooks.