RE: Tulloch5 Jun 2026 14:34
“ The board can draw up all the presentations they want, but a corporate slide deck cannot stop a regional wet season or fast-track an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Blue Mountain. The market is flat because the board is refusing to release speculative timelines until the physical gold is securely passing through the wash plants.”
This is your inferral, it's not a comment that has come from the board and that's the problem. We know there is a wet season there but a production start dates, month or quarter has never been confidently communicated. Ragland went completely silent beyond February until recently and was barely even mentioned in any of the online interviews. Even the notion that gold is moving through the washplant, I think we're all fine if it's gonna be a few more months, or if its happening now even better - show pictures. The X page should be posting almost daily pictures of work going on to really build that confidence in delivery.
The idea that Nick can be a part time chairman for the company is crazy, there is so much potential here and so much more they could be doing to promote the company, secure future investment, help the growth of the SP. This could and should become a company in the 10's if not hundreds of millions in value and it needs that dedication corporately as well as on the ground to get there.
I'm actually really confident in BM based on the detail they have given so far for that one.
Ultimately I still have confidence in them for now but I am feeling frustrated at what feels like basic errors. It almost feels like the hard part is being done and its the easier bit - really promoting your success and building that confidence, that is the gap.