Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE
Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO
Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPOView Video
Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant
Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plantView Video

Latest Share Chat

UPDATE 1-EU court sets criteria for GSK case on "pay-for-delay" drug deals

Thu, 30th Jan 2020 09:45

(Adds court comments, background)

BRUSSELS, Jan 30 (Reuters) - The European Union's top court
set criteria on Thursday to resolve a dispute in Britain over
deals GlaxoSmithKline struck with rival drugmakers to
delay the launch of generic drugs.

The court said these deals in themselves do not constitute a
breach of competition rules but their impact needed to be
assessed because they could harm competition.

The case was brought before the court by GSK after Britain's
competition watchdog fined the drugmaker 37.6 million pounds
($49 million) in 2016 for its so-called "pay-for-delay" deals
that postponed the launch of cheaper copies of an
anti-depressant.

"It is necessary to determine how the market will probably
operate and be structured in the absence of the concerted
practice," the court said in its assessment of the potential
harm to competition caused by such deals.

The British Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) had said
that between 2001 and 2004 GSK paid generic drug companies over
50 million pounds with the intention of delaying the release of
cheap generic versions of its former blockbuster Seroxat after
its patent expired in 1999.

The EU court said on Thursday that the ability of each
generic manufacturer to access the market had to be assessed in
deciding whether the deals were unlawful.

If generic drugmakers were not in a position to sell their
cheaper copy of Seroxat there would have been no harm to
competition, the court concluded, effectively leaving a British
appeal tribunal to settle the dispute.

There was no immediate reaction to the court's comments from
GSK.
(Reporting by Francesco Guarascio;
Editing by Philip Blenkinsop and Andrew Cawthorne)

Related Shares

More News
Today 09:51

LONDON BROKER RATINGS: AstraZeneca target raised; Antofagasta lowered

(Alliance News) - The following London-listed shares received analyst recommendations Tuesday morning and Friday:

2 May 2024 19:57

GSK knew about Zantac cancer risk, attorneys tell jury in first trial

May 2 (Reuters) - U.S. attorneys for a woman who claims her colon cancer was caused by the now discontinued heartburn drug Zantac on Thursday told a...

2 May 2024 09:48

LONDON BROKER RATINGS: Deutsche Bank likes TP ICAP but says sell CMC

(Alliance News) - The following London-listed shares received analyst recommendations Thursday morning and Wednesday:

1 May 2024 19:39

Bird flu testing shows more dairy products are safe, US FDA says

CHICAGO, May 1 (Reuters) - Preliminary results of tests on additional dairy products show that pasteurization inactivates the bird flu virus, the U....

1 May 2024 17:31

UK's FTSE 100 slips ahead of Fed outcome, energy stocks weigh

FTSE 100 down 0.3%, FTSE 250 off 0.2% *

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.