The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Thanks LFM, surely they should have issed an RNS? Do you know how long the extension is
They have agreed a short extension to the agreement to commence the BIT claim, from a reply from the company. I expected something like this because it’s always been one extension after another on this.
@LFM I understand the frustration but cannot think what can be said that has not already been stated. Surely being in a position where details are privileged is much better than general statements that could be construed as being no where close to an agreement. Would you be placated by a statement saying ….. we’re investigating options that we cannot discuss in public due to confidentiality ….. Whatever is happening will be under a confidentiality agreement. We know timelines are fluid with PFP, I remain positive that things are in train
We are certainly due updates on both, I’ve also sent a stinging email to them last night, complaining about the lack of information been given to us on both subjects.
Morning Lfm,
Relating to the RTO, the BIT or both ?
Adamsky
I am expecting a RNS at some point this week.
Agsin before ajn had a large audtralisn minor set up who would off bought the claim and by now it would be generating money for the moz goverment
Legallly make claim thats claim by saturday...3 months legally have now passed nothing again its an unessesary delay in the bit process which is affecting the income off the moz goverment
Hi Adamsky,
I already put some thoughts down around the end of Sep and nothing has changed yet!
Post 1 – “Indeed bankrupty and, as you suggest, that certainly would matter if they were to dally excessively in lining up the way ahead. However, assuming they have something already in their sights, the consequent RTO would aim to wrap things up within an entirely different, newly-financed wrapper.
With similarities to the way an IPO comes to market, certain assets would be assembled within a proposed company (that is currently PFP) and the SP at relisting would likely be unrelated to the current SP. Instead it would come back from RTO process at an entirely new valuation based on a number of factors, such as asset valuation, shares in issue post-RTO, stage of project development, perceived timeframe to production/asset realisation, confidence in characters involved, level of appetite shown by instis and/or HNWIs etc. etc.”
Post 2 – “I don't think the future valuation will work like that Adamsky. While all the things you mention are important in terms of an attractive platform, I think the future valuation will be based more on the type of things I listed yesterday. In other words, a "step back" revaluation of NewCo on its new assets and prospects, a return to market at that sort of level and thereafter settling down in line with the normal market forces of supply and demand. At the moment, of course, it's a matter of how long's a piece of string and taking a punt, or not, according to how we read the runes.
I read them positively and, like bankrupty, have added substantially at current levels against the backdrop of my own take, again similar to bankrupty's. It's a punt but the way I see it is that once they're ready to go forward with something, the chance to add will be very likely be gone until after the RTO process is completed and the current £2m market cap is less than demanding against what the new "entrepreneurial geologists" are deeming to be an "exciting" future. DYOR.”
Poppyseed,
Thank you for your excellent research, have you had any experience of RTO’s and projected price for current PPF shareholders if it completes?
Oldblue1973,
You are incorrect, the starting of the BIT process has nothing to do with whether Pathfinder continues as a company, it is solely down to the RTO.
If by the end of the week no news about the BIT, I will e-mail the company asking what is happening.
Kept the faith.
Adamsky
So nothing friday last official day today so monday or we goingbto get nothing snd the company wound up no rns etc
Companies House reveals a change of Company Secretary effective today. Clearly a move to more than just any old admin outfit and more suggestion that the ducks are closing in on getting into line. Looks to be a wide-ranging quality appointment which adds to my positive take on the new executive appointment. Shaping up!
https://www.silvertree-partners.com/en/
PFP have never once been on time with anything, this won’t be any different
Last working day no rns...end buisness have to try legally till 3 month end so tonight or monday morning
Presumably therefore a 60% dilution for existing share holders and an EGM vote to get past ? A yes vote would presumably be based on the NewCo shares being worth more to the holders.
Not quite the same but similarities in taking a government to BIT over mining licenses. Possible yard stick maybe. Hhttps://twitter.com/cadenceminerals/status/1725061769729609966?s=46&t=b6za1ZtTKGiqyeh7V14hBQ extra “H” in the link.
I don’t think we will necessarily need a lot of cash for the next transaction, obviously we do need enough to cover legal.
Look at models for asset acquisition that Mark Gasson has previously been envisaging relating to his activities with AJN.. I feel something similar could work well here..
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1026425/ajn-resources-positioned-for-soaring-lithium-demand-with-lucrative-drc-deposits-1026425.html
“We started looking for projects in the Congo more than three years ago,” director and CFO Mark Gasson told Proactive.
“We signed an agreement with the state which outlined a new model for Congo. The idea was that the state would transfer 21 gold licences and one lithium license, the extension of the Manono pegmatites, into a local subsidiary, Congo Resources. AJN would acquire 100% of Congo Resources and the state would receive 60% of AJN's share capital.”
Does anyone think most folk sold out after sept date just shell now...25th oct no cash extra 400k not gonba buy an rto next plscing feb 3 months now it goes kn the shelf or delisted
You’re never positive!, surely you can’t own any shares in PFP with this attitude
The wheels on the bus go round and round roynd and round....ohh damn its come offf....aaaaahhhh
Could do with an update as to how the search is going and if we have found something how far down the line it is
I’m happy at this price to keep stocking up, my investments will easily double, on the next RNS this share will hit .5 therefore an instant double, after that who knows but your mad not to take the free money
Perhaps I'm the only one who gets excited about this sort of thing but to me good house keeping goes hand in hand with good management. On the PFP website Mr Trew is now credited with a 4.76% holding which would equate to circa 30m shares. This is larger that the circa 17million he held in the past which was 2.71% in reality after dilution although the website continued to state the pre-dilution 3.72%. Hopefully this can all be cleared up with a RNS as the Eckhof situation was. Interesting to consider that the apparent rise in Trew's holding is close to Eckhof's previously stated holding. Of course it could all be typos and careless reporting which would be a disappointing reflection on the current management's attention to detail.
This is easy a double your money now even in a cash shell
Sigh.....there all buys and there also all sells funny that for a trade somone hss to buy snd some had to sell the red or blue just indicate if it isabove or below the share price or if its on the share price it will be black
.
So reslky its just a perception that you are making that it is a buy or a sell in regstds to the colour it has which effectivly just indicates the trade was made above or below the shown share price