Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
"Focusing only on the positives blinds shareholders to the possibility of very negative realities."
Then surely the opposite also holds true - focusing on the negative blinds potential shareholders and LTHs to possibility of very positive realities. In other words, stock bashing. I guess that's the closest you'll come to an admission of what you're doing, what we all know you're doing - focusing on the negative to try and drive down the SP. Typical stock bashing behaviour.
Don't bother denying it any more booth - you've just confessed.
so do you or don't you expect good news over time? if you do staying long makes sense. if you dont,why stay? you are getting into a real muddle today.cue mr shouty!
then why post a shed load of negative stuff, much of it totally speculative or completely irrelevant, whist you wait? notwhat i would do. you know it makes sense but good to know you expect good news over time.
agreed bucolic. i rarely read his links though, as it is just more of the same. the odd ones i have read tend to have a slightly uncomfortable feel to them.wonder which one of them has draw the christmas day shift?
The.Italian, it's like talking to a malfunctioning robot, it just answers with nonsense and gobbledegook! I think it's currently on about masturbation again, it seems fixated on the subject.
booth i repeat my own outstanding question.why are you long? what could possibly be the point of maintaining a long position given your view?obvious dissembling.
think about what he is saying. he is saying because person A says they believe something, but do not say that person B also believes it the conclusion is that B does not believe it.dont think its difficult to see how absurd this is.
*I'm fairly certain that The.Italian won't have posted the same thing simultaneously this time!
Booth, you're the biggest mechanical stimulator I know. With or without the menthol gel you keep referring to.
bucolic,amused to see we have posted almost the same thing at the same time.i await the accusation that we one and the same.oh and yes, it is shouty i think.
pretty poor response booth.first the clusmsy phrase"because something has not been officially announced"seeking suggest that it has happened but just not announced.absolutely no evidence of this although i have asked if you can provide it.second .straw man response.i have nevenever suggested that because something has not happened it cannot happen.what i am saying saying is that at your repeated suggestions that there have been claims is baseless,which it is.
Is that Mr Shouty? Reads like one of his semi-literate offerings.
"So again according to some posters because something has not been be officially announced to the market as having happened yet."
If that's the best you've got, booth, why even bother? You're not even making sense. Anyway, that's your target met for today, and that certainly was a real stinker!
I'm sure you've tried it during one of your team building helmet polishing events. BTW, if that was your attempt at injecting some humour into your posts, I can see why you don't usually bother. By the way, I suffer from anosmia but I can smell your BS from here, even from Cornwall with the wind blowing in your general direction. Only one more stinking pile to post, then you can put your feet up until 0026 hrs tomorrow!
so no actual claims then against fum, as im sure if there had been any you or your team would know about it.clearly we can dismiss entirely any further suggestions by you along this line.also good to see the effort to maintain your posts at an elevated level is proving taxing.
You're peaking early, booth. You only require two more stinking piles of manure to reach your daily target.
Experts in the ED field are saying MED3000 efficacy nears that of first line treatment.
The resident share basher Liambooth is the ONLY ONE that says they are wrong.
The I/E protocol is in the public domain for anyone to see.
Also Re "Why is this inclusion criteria not being mentioned on the Eroxon website under How do I know if Eroxon® is suitable for me? Eroxon® will be labelled very clearly and will contain a leaflet with warnings and precautions. Please check the label carefully before purchase and if in doubt ask the pharmacist or consult a doctor before use."
Same reason when you go to by Viagra the I/E criteria is not mentioned. Not on websites, what the i/E criteria is for Viagra/ Cialis from their trials. This is no different. It is a i/E criteria for a clinical trial, not a who can and cannot take it.
These points and other points, have been discussed many many times before but the sharebasher keeps pasting back the same things again and again, when they been discussed here on this board many times.
HE IS A PAID SHARE BASHER, HERE FACTS ABOUT LIAMBOOTH.
Liambooth joined LSE March 2021 when Fum spiked in price
- Same time in March 2021 Fum was shorted "Fum have 5.7m shares out on loan (being shorted) which is 2.08% of the total share allocation."
- Since March 2021 Liambooth has posted 1000+ negative posts on LSE, misleading, distorted and untrue claims with no real hard evidence of anything.
- Liambooth posted hundreds more negative posts on ADVN, and no posts before March 2021 neither, check yourselves
- He ain't a LTH, he lying to you all.
- He clearly is a stock basher. Lying and deceiving in his posts
There is no omission of the information about the FM57 inclusion criteria by the director or anyone at FUM.
It is in the protocol, it is all over clinicaltrials.gov, it was known to all participants all 1200, all investigators, regulatory bodies, investors, every one that wants to know it is out there in the public.
The CSR, protocol, technical dossiers and other documents are all sent to regulatory authorities.
It's been debated on here to death
But the share basher Liambooth keeps posting points he has been shown as wrong no before. Because he is a share basher.
Neither is it significant at all.
Detailed analysis of the pivotal FM57 data shows remarkably consistent outcomes for MED3000 across all treatment groups. There are clear and statistically meaningful improvements for the three co-primary endpoints, and also statistical superiority over baseline for Mild, Moderate, and Severe forms of ED (erectile dysfunction). The results are consistent when viewed across patient groups, study centres, geographies, and CROs performing the trial.
There are clear and statistically meaningful improvements. Increase from Baseline.
Experts say efficacy nearing that of first line treatment. They had ALL the information before making those statements.
It works, the end.
The share basher has a short and wants to scare and make up total lies, not got a leg to stand on, always .
HE IS A PAID SHARE BASHER, HERE FACTS ABOUT LIAMBOOTH.
Liambooth joined LSE March 2021 when Fum spiked in price
- Same time in March 2021 Fum was shorted "Fum have 5.7m shares out on loan (being shorted) which is 2.08% of the total share allocation."
- Since March 2021 Liambooth has posted 1000+ negative posts on LSE, misleading, distorted and untrue claims with no real hard evidence of anything.
- Liambooth posted hundreds more negative posts on ADVN, and no posts before March 2021 neither, check yourselves
- He ain't a LTH, he lying to you all.
- He clearly is a stock basher. Lying and deceiving in his posts
"As I said before..." "I would have thought..." "I suppose..." "Also not sure..." "I presume..." "Maybe it's a similar case..." "Could some claim...?"
Basher booth's posts are just piles of stinking innuendo, lies, mischievous suggestion and total BS. Even he must feel ashamed every time he drops one (especially at 0026 every morning, almost as though it's a timed post aimed at having his comment up the longest without adverse reaction) but I suppose the money he gets paid for his stock bashing makes up for any guilt he might feel. Oh well, only 7 more stinking piles to reach today's target, eh booth?
just answer the specific question.have there been any legal actions against fum in the circumstances you outline? that is what constitutes a claim in any meaningful sense.just answer it.
if you mean by"claim" to maintain a successful form of legal action, then my short answer is "no". were any legal claims made and successfully concluded against FUM in the circumstances you describe? nothing to see here.
BTW, you ask me about T&Cs and to answers your questions (which I done)
but you run a way like a little P**sy when any one asks you to provide any evidence to support any of your claim
NO NEED TO REPLY. The whole Board knows. It is because you are a proven share basher.
Wetting myself. and ROFLMAO
@Liambooth - Everyone knows your a share basher, LOL and as you once quoted: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt" — ABRAHAM LINCOLN.
Too late to for you
I must mention again, Laimbooth doesn't realise what the whole board is seeing and knowS about him. HE IS A PAID SHARE BASHER, HERE FACTS ABOUT LIAMBOOTH.
Liambooth joined LSE March 2021 when Fum spiked in price
- Same time in March 2021 Fum was shorted "Fum have 5.7m shares out on loan (being shorted) which is 2.08% of the total share allocation."
- Since March 2021 Liambooth has posted 1000+ negative posts on LSE, misleading, distorted and untrue claims with no real hard evidence of anything.
- Liambooth posted hundreds more negative posts on ADVN, and no posts before March 2021 neither, check yourselves
- He ain't a LTH, he lying to you all.
- He clearly is a stock basher. Lying and deceiving in his posts
PS have i mentioned to you all (IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT SHAREBASHER LIAMBOOTH)
Liambooth joined LSE March 2021 when Fum spiked in price
- Same time in March 2021 Fum was shorted "Fum have 5.7m shares out on loan (being shorted) which is 2.08% of the total share allocation."
- Since March 2021 Liambooth has posted 1000+ negative posts on LSE, misleading, distorted and untrue claims with no real hard evidence of anything.
- Liambooth posted hundreds more negative posts on ADVN, and no posts before March 2021 neither, check yourselves
- He ain't a LTH, he lying to you all.
- He clearly is a stock basher. Lying and deceiving in his posts
So don't entertain or believe a word he is saying, he is a proven share basher.
LSE won't do a thing.
And yes Quid Pro Quo, ROFLMAO wetting pants and quoting Lincoln.
Re Liambooth last post "Still no answer? Why did Futura have to put “for illustrative purposes only as data is derived from different clinical studies’"
I have already replied back: ssl1975, Posted in: FUM, Posts: 484, Price: 32.80, No Opinion, RE: very positive28 Nov 2021 18:28
Tells me the share bashing employees don't communicate vey much to get their story right. more holes than (well you can all answer back, clean or not )
Let me repeat the simple fact as I did back in my reply to THE SHARE BASHER LIAM BOOTH (ROFLMOA)
Same reason as all websites / disclosure of data / public releases / article have T&C's including her some of his own articles he loves to post. Both Anonymous by the way. But one is quite damming, (THE KALMBACH) - stating posters are paid to write articles and they are not responsible for what they post!!!!, just as the anonymous writer was?
SMSNA
"Disclaimer
The information on this website is intended for educational purposes only. It is not intended to be used for the diagnosis or treatment of any specific medical condition, which should only be done by a qualified physician or health care professional."
And you keep claiming it should be accepted LMAO. Even they say. It's educational only, but seek professional opinion by "qualified physician or health care professional."
Kalmbach (Discovery) article posted..says payment etc?
Your interactions with organizations and/or individuals, including payment and delivery of goods or services, and any other terms, conditions, warranties or representations associated with such dealings, are solely between you and such organizations and/or individuals. You should make whatever investigation you feel necessary or appropriate before proceeding with any online or offline transaction with any of these organizations or individuals.
You agree that Kalmbach Publishing Co. shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage of any sort incurred as the result of any such dealings. If there is a dispute between participants on this site, or between users and any third party, you understand and agree that Kalmbach Publishing Co. is under no obligation to become involved. In the event that you have a dispute with one or more other users, you hereby release Kalmbach Publishing Co., its officers, employees, agents and successors in rights from claims, demands and damages (actual and consequential) of every kind or nature, known or unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising out of or in any way related to such disputes and/or our service.
Violation of any of these agreements will result in the termination of your account with the sites. While we prohibit such conduct and content on our site, you understand and agree that Kalmbach Publishing Co. cannot be responsible for the content posted on its sites and you nonetheless may be exposed to such materials and that you use the sites at your own risk.
Has anyone actually read his reply .
Recommend this post if you have not