Firering Strategic Minerals: From explorer to producer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I think most people have explained what this debate was and wasn't about very clearly underneath. If you expected a vote on vaccine passports today then you haven't done any research whatsoever.
The reason they all seemed "against" the vaccine passports is because they were debating the petition which was raised and signed by people who have concerns about the idea (290,000 out of 66million+ people). The MP's were representing the people who have concerns. The government review has only just started and the comments made will be noted during that official review. The main concerns being ethics/practicality/data protection/necessity etc.
A lot of people seem to have the idea that this is purely a decision for the government and that its make or break for CTEA dependant on their decision. As highlighted during the debate, this simply isn't the case. Private companies, airlines and other governments can and have made their own choice for proof of vaccine requirements. Saga holidays and international airlines are already saying you will need to prove you are vaccinated before you can travel. The requirements will increase daily by different companies requiring proof of vaccination, for both domestic and international situations. As quite rightly mentioned, the government will only be able to control this requirement for UK border crossing.
If you want to travel or go to an event where the organiser requires proof of vaccination then that's all there is to it. And I'm sure insurance companies will be jumping on board with this as we speak, all your medical background is up for debate when it comes to travel insurance, so why would covid be any different. Who out there will be travelling without being vaccinated knowing they will be paying a premium for such things as insurance because they didn't want the vaccine???
As far as data protection goes, you can't really beat a GDPR compliant Blockchain technology. Most of the MP's concerns around this were due to large corporations having masses of personal data being a threat, or the government being in control of this ??. CTEA are in existence to solve this very problem.
The opportunities lie with providing solutions for thousands of companies domestically and internationally, not just one possible scheme with the government.
I think I'm rambling now....
GLA
Do some research at least haha
Good post Ralph. I do wish people would do a little bit of research before posting drivel