Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
has not lead in volume either Nasdaq did around 60 Million shares Monday-Wednesday about 3 or 4 weeks ago
while London did about 14M same 3 sessions, during all the London trying to break away and Nasdaq not
their volume churned daily was much much higher than London
Only recently has the balance shifted back to London higher daily volumes
Yes I agree, London should lead the price as the primary listing and volume. The company do seem to run their share raisers thouhg the US though as was mentioned earlier....Gabriele does like the Nas and thinks worth a lot more being listed there...
Not on this share since March they have lagged behind until recently when they even had a day where their
price exceeded London
London SHOULD always lead on this share as until such time as they complete the proposed cancellation
of AIM and the Nasdaq ADS for a straight Nasdaq listing (RNA delayed not cancelled)
London is officially the primary listing for this share but for the past 3 months you wouldn't think so
The US do generally follow the UK price though I think you'll find.
ya kinda missing the point
London cannot drive cos YANKS have the hand brake on, no way will the markets controllers allow
NQ to fester at 80p to £1 and Let London soar to £4 - £6 at some point they will have to go big together
and stay UP
can't have the same company valued at 500m and 2 -4 billion either side of the pond
The tail has been wagging the dog since March, $10M raised on the Nasdaq , $20M additional funding
future funding arranged on the Nasdaq, price in London TRYING to scream since Mid March the Nasdaq
held it back never got out of the 47-56p equivalent range while London had many a crack at 60-85p
The plan was to scrap both AIM and Nasdaq ADS listing for a straight Nasdaq listing (RNA delayed
not as some say cancelled)
So its been as if they went ahead and put the NQ in charge without doing the paper work and letting
the rest of us know, until they let the NQ break with us which if finally looked like it was going to a
week ago, it continues to hold London back as it has the past 2 1/2 Months
ONE DAY RODNEY ONE DAY
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM Heard by the Herd both sides of the pond
Thank you All, appreciate the correction and thoughts!
To go on Nasdaq ADS their is a minimum initial ADS share price, so uk companies floating on ADS have to meet that
requirement , which last I looked a while ago was $2 per ADS share which at todays rate would be 5 x 32p minimum
6.40 divided by 5 multiply dollars to pound today rate 0.81 = £1.04 (1.0368)
each nq ads share = 5 aim shares
$6.40 = £1.04, I fink.
vbw
Surely the price should be at £1.90ish when you do the comparison with the price on Nasdaq at $6.40 given different volume of share allocation and exchange rate. Or am I missing something?
Thanks