If you would like to ask our webinar guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund a question please submit them here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Disguise rather than reinvent. Leopards and spots. Imagine there's a lot of it going about.
I know finally understand what his 2.50 price predictions meant. He just failed to omit the £ sign in favour of a p.
Shaungreen has had more reincarnations than Buddah. I can't keep up with him. He changes his pseudonym every month and yet people can still identify him via the drivel that he types. I didn't think having multiple pseudonyms was allowed on LSE chat boards? Naughty Shaun and his wonky abacus.
A mythical investor of truly extraordinary intellect. AKA "The smartest bear of them all".
AKA "Mr 2.50 himself".
AKA "He of 1000 logins".
I like SG47. He has a conscience. A real man. Disparaged those who bothered Mr Parsons with emails. So when he decided he needed some of that one on one action he had the good grace to hide his embarrassment under the Ziggy persona. Well done him. Couldn't go back to SG47 when the ruse was identified so spawned Mahatma. Chipper guy. I would like to think that Porcu Pine is his new guise in the mission to ridicule Mr Trellis and his group. Bravo. Always reinventing himself.
The unending logic vacuum that is SG47
The company is happy with a conflict of interest having a Chairman who is a shareholder and director of C4 energy, the holder of the bonds yet to be repaid. It is sailing close to the wind in interpretation of what is correct. Don't expect too much in terms of business ethics.
I asked that question in the FSC and the answer was unequivocally no - there is no link to any current or previous Sound employee or any of their known their associates. I wouldn't put it past this company to post a bold-faced lie on the internet, but I guess we have no choice but to believe such definitive statements from the BoD.
I have a horrible feeling that the unknown private entity may uncomfortable connections with
people or person we are already familiar with.
Was in my cache so cut/pasted. Yes, I've seen all the videos and appreciate the technical details as do the 15 interested parties. Yes, looking forward to the DD being completed and opening a new chapter. Am cautiously optimistic and happy to invest now. I presume you may be one of the chaps looking for a cheaper entry or maybe risk adverse looking to invest once sign off agreed. The latter is fine by me, nothing wrong with being cautious.
may be it was in the same thread with mine saying we might need to engage with ONHYM and SLB (though they might not answer) because they are in theory aligned with PIs contrary to James Parson, the guy who has shown no integrity and as such cant be trusted along with his Friend the act chairman.
Strange...
Folks can be disappointed that elements of the deal aren't to their liking but assuming you believe it is a fair competitive bid process I trust the BOD have chosen the best available option. It might not be as good as expected but with 15 interested parties I would say there's a good chance the 'fair market value' of the asset is realised. Would you rather have had an RNS announcing a placing instead at significant dilution or a death-spiral financing arrangement? This is AIM! Sound are fortunate to have competitive bids and a chance to open up the assets full potential.
The 'unreasonable terms' of the deal are part of the negotiation. Of course it's in their favour if they get the extra 9% in the success case, but if that's still the best deal on the table then the BOD are right to take it and will justify it in the near future when the DD is complete. I think people are also forgetting what the value of 14% of a successful exploration case translates to for shareholders. It's the dream dividend case scenario and worth significantly more than the (frankly ridiculous) £32m MCap.
TE-5 is a good start and have listened to the geology interpretation videos explaining the model discrepancies and am quite comfortable with the risk-reward here. Of course, there's no risk (or upside) if you're not invested ;)