The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Obviously if he's calling her lindy now
i have no idea who Lindy corresponds with, however the original 5 two of the investors knew lindy very well i think they got in from the start can't remember the names but one had 7,000,000 shares and probably still does .. as he has attended every AGM since
lol ...
What is it about scientists and coffee?
only at the coffee machine ... after the Investor day i asked her for a quick chat .. and Lindy dragged me off for coffee i did not refuse
Ok, so does that mean she only really corresponds with you? I wouldn't like to try and understand what she says. Well done you for being able to.
Have you met her outside of the AGMs then?
I have met lindy many times, She appreciates that I make the effort to understand, also only about 5 of us attended the 2012 AGM ... so some interesting discussions ..
the links by the way are from Goosed .. i just reposted them inc Goosed mentioned as source
I'm just wondering whether Professor Durrant often gets involved as adjudicator on this BB? Does she correspond with anyone who writes to her?
It works with IB as much of the protein does not fold and is degraded via autophagy which causes siPTMs. However,
peptide is more efficient.
lind
no its all sorted ... i have posted the exact text from lindy confirmed by Bunsie .. if you want a copy i can send via other channels
Inanaco,
I have been out all day and have just got back and caught up with the bb.
Firstly, in your 11.31 you posted a link to a set of claims, but they're an old set from 2017 and have been amended at least 3 times since then with some of them being knocked back by the examiner. You need to look at the document submitted on 28th August 2020 as these are the claims that have been approved for grant.
Most of the discussion seems to be centred around a DNA version of Moditope - is that correct? Are you able to tell us exactly what you asked LD in your email - ie. your precise wording?
Finally, I haven't read back over the whole debate as it seems to go back over several days but if the above is correct, wouldn't it be more useful to look at the patent covering nucleic acids rather than this one?
Honestly Inanaco you simply don’t get it.
I made the point my Biology “O” level was the last exam I failed and you take that as a sign of weakness and negativity whereas I take it as being of absolute no importance and a positive message as it means that the 100 plus exams I have taken since all at a higher level than “O”level I passed.
I know that you will call me “ egotistical” for stating that but honestly I can’t give a stuff about it but you always get the wrong end of the stick and still insist you are right.
Burble,
Can I add my fourth, fifth, sixth to that - please do not stop posting.
Do what I have done and filter him. He is the first and only person I have ever filtered and my life is richer for it. Should have done it before and saved myself years of drivel and abuse.
so basically you want posters that post on the science even if they get it wrong ...
surely Ivy can play that role Paul87 ....
You know something. A lot of us have been in this share for years and have grown ever increasingly tired of some of the rants that take place on this board. Then along comes Burble like a breath of fresh air with hands on experience and a sound knowledge base in the oncology area and all some can do is get in his face to try and discredit him. Personally I would like to thank him for his contribution as I did Berm a couple of weeks ago. We all know there are about four on here who know what they are talking about and have the humility to engage courteously with other posters. Burble I realise that you have better things to do than get into arguments on here but please continue to post your thoughts because, as ever, it is the silent majority who appreciate your efforts.
"" To repeat it is not about being right""
ivy you failed Biology ... how would you know what was right or wrong ?
Inanaco despite your assertions I am not interested in BB politics.
If I thought Burble or BS or anyone posted something I disagreed with I would respond.
What I don’t want is an excellent poster like Burble to stop posting simply because he does not want to engage in petty pointless arguments when he has far more important things to be dealing with.
I do feel Inanaco if you only toned down your responses to be less confrontational you would personally gain a lot more from this BB.
You claim to love debating the science so would have thought you would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with someone like Burble.
To repeat it is not about being right and sending an e mail to Bunsie( who I have no reason to doubt) who then confirms you are right is asking you to believe me sending an e mail to Ruck who I dont know and then him posting saying I was right and you were wrong.
You would certainly not believe that and that would be fair so please accord us the same respect.
GL
i can show you an example of that ref your mouse post ......... instantly picked up by Ruck as ""authoritative"" and he used that data to knock scancells mouse data ... even thou Scancells mouse data is proven ....
Burble I'll second / whoops 3rd that. Please keep posting.
No .. that is not what i want ......... you have skin in the game
but what you are very inexperienced in ... is BB politics and how Ivy and Ruck etc will manipulate you which is why Bunsie passed comment
but you have to stay focused on Scancell and how risk is applied to scancell etc ... which is what i do ! hence you get probing questions ... but if you respond broad sheet you actually are doing the opposite and feeding those that will knock scancell using your posts ...
Burble please do not stop posting and in fact imo there is no need fir an apology as the blame lies squarely at the feet of Inanaco.
The reality is Inanaco falls out with everyone and never admits he is wrong so you cannot possibly win an argument in his head.You May win the argument in everyone else’s view but does not matter as he will never admit it.
He is seriously asking every poster to choose who to believe a guy with no scientific qualifications or experience whatsoever but a huge ego vs a guy with proven expertise,working in the field and always demonstrates humility and modesty.
It seems a pretty clear choice to me.
Inanaco he has never sought to challenge you or take you down a peg or two as it is clear it not that important to him or anyone else.Whereas you are obsessed see with being “Head Poster” and see everyone as being a threat and when someone like Burble comes along who has clear superior and original knowledge you simply don’t like it.
Well get over it as compared to him you are just not clever enough.
ATB
Inan
I'm not trying to pull you down a peg in the slightest. Please do not think that is my motive because honest to god it isn't. I have far more important things to do than get into stupid petty slanging matches on an investors bulletin board. If it has come across that way then I do apologise. To be honest with you, if it makes you happy I can just as easily stop posting and leave you to it - I have far more important things to be doing with my life than arguing with a glowing set of pixels.
Burble ..... the point was not that moditope is modified epitopes ...... its that you ""insisted"" it cannot be done ...
now i have no idea ... of the technicals of it .. other than Lindy has said in the past she can and the patent confirmed it
the point about my science ........... its only scancell !!
That is what i am invested in .. and that is why i am rarely wrong because i tried to get my head around it ... and if i don't quite get it, Lindy helps me
you made a big mistake chap thinking you could pull me down a peg and get away with it without an apology ..
i have no interest in your posts that suggest on off switches for Car T .. as a risk for scancell
we are not even in the Car T field ..
you cannot argue with Lindy ... who are you ?