We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I had a quick look and I believe ivy is right. It is a sale with an agreement by the buyer to deliver the same stock to the seller at some time in the future. Voting rights go to the buyer in the interim
No ivyspivey2. No. Wrong wrong wrong wrong. TR1s are transfer of ownership, lending is a contractual arrangement and does not require a TR1
OK two things
1) You do not issue a TR1 because you've lent your stock. You still own the stock even if you lend it. You issue a TR1 because you have crossed an ownership threshold. I can lend 15 of my 20% hypothetical holding and not issue a TR1. There is no reference to lending in the TR1, there is even a checked tickbox explicitly telling you its a disposal. So guys, please, HSBC have sold. Simple as. I have no idea who started that ******ed theory on this board but the fact half of you believe it says all I need to know about the level of research the shareholder base in this company can achieve.
2) 27,000 shares on Nasdaq is sjit volume given it's 0.70USD. It's probably higher today with people selling out before their shares get kicked off Nasdaq too, the only way is down for those shares now.
Lawson, they filed a TR-1, disposal box ticked. That means they do not own the stock anymore, sold it. I think this is the reason for the SP weakness.
Yanis. They lent the stock not sold it.
rhumba exactly.i think if i hear once more the plaintive cry of "foul" in relation to the mms i shall go mad!they are not here to be our friends!
Bought in at 3.05p.
Nasdaq compliance did not cause it. Drop is probably down to HSBC selling the rest of it.
https://investegate.co.uk/motif-bio-plc/rns/holding-s--in-company/201907181630460354G/
Rhambo - Volume on Nasdaq today is 27,000 shares....please explain why it is flat according to your comment below.
So your telling me the 10% drop is due to the issue with the Nasdaq listing not being compliant yet over on the Nasdaq where the investors understand the implications of this non compliance the price is flat lmao....smoking trees again pal
180 days to gain compliance.....funding news will send this back to around 7/8p ($3 on nasdaq) remember this comment and post i will remind you in a few weeks
When their share is in the sjitter, a favourite target of BBMs is market makers. MMs don't care about price or intrinsic value, they care about volume. If they can't generate volume they will drop the price. They drop price because of supply and demand factors. If there is low demand for a company going bust in 6 weeks without a fundraise, then the price drops. Same reason it got pumped this week, not because it was worth anything, but because some rampy behaviour got people buying and raising the price kept the volume going...until it ran out of steam. And now BBMs are finding themselves, despite warning, getting spiked out.
Based on nothing...false drop today as evidenced by the Nasdaq listing which is pretty much flat
shocking by the mm's but if folk sell to them then they will rob you all day long