We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Which is why I changed the wording from 'major'... I thought keeping that would identify you unfairly Connie. :)
*not ‘major’....big shareholders.
I’m not sure how the mechanics of it all work out but if one shareholder is told company sensitive information, then ALL shareholders must be told. Is that not correct?
It still rankles me that there were posters on here (I won’t name them, you know who you are) that were/are major shareholders, and they didn’t lose their s*#t after the 300% dilution. However, up to that point they disputed that a raise was on the agenda and there was programmed steady selling in the four to six weeks prior. The same people disappeared from posting on here for a few weeks and then reappeared announcing what a great opportunity to buy it was. Therefore, I firmly believe there were ‘people in the know’, back then. Can’t say I’ve noticed it as much this time but it all leads me to believe, BRD is a bit on the bendy side of right and wrong.
unless you have inside information that is only allowed to be publish through rns, I am sure everybody here including you, can write what we are guessing and predicting for future expected news by the company. But if you want to keep it yourself and to not share your analysis and understanding of the company future, then its upto you.
Connie,
Wow, I didn't expect that. I respect the amazing progress the current management have made and believe the future is bright but some concerns, not just from me do need addressing.
I am finding the actual mechanics of looking at overall share dealing awesomely complicated. No wonder the London Stock exchange can only guess whether Aim trades are buys or sells under the present system.
Thanks.
You folks may say I am deramping but It looks like management of BlueRock Diamonds may be abusing their power inside the company, why would they be worried about external abuse.
- Paying hefty interest rate to themselves (former CEO) and new management also not acting to get rid of it quickly
- Buying asset from their another invested company – not doing transparent tender calls with other companies to get competitive prices for asset. If that is the only available, then?
- They are paying that plant cost over three years- wonder there is any interest attached for paying on instalment
- Not being transparent on how much cash reserves company had before and after placing
- Board knew they need to raise money (after spending all those revenues earned of 2019 and money raised twice in early 2019) but did not do any during January when the share price was above 110p, most of the month – only their brain got lit up (ting!) when the share price starts dropping below 100p.
- Giving favourable terms to Teichmann- I am sure Teichmann is asking their work done fees strictly for every month. Or are they telling ok you can give this month fees on instalment over 6 months and so on for coming months. Thank you for giving us contract
Connie what sort of fireworks can we predict to expect from company next week:
- takeover information from Teichmann or other rival nearby companies at massive valuation?
- Big stone found? - if yes, then they must have been keeping it secret just to tell us after placing to benefit them and their nearer and dearer
- Q1 production report will only come in April first week
- Numovista plant, for production booster is only coming live into production at the end of Q2 2020
- Connecting to national grid will obviously take more than couple of months
- Management only interested at piling Options (also hasn’t bought any) for them and forget about buying at regular or premium price
- Company conducting due diligence work to purchase another mine field? – no, way.
- Obviously company development plan for the next months/year - which may produce no material impact because they might be saying the same information which we all know.
- Am I missing any?
The surprising fireworks, they have already given us- placing to raise £1.9m i.e. also they are not getting most of the money now. Yes, the company is doing more production, brought and working hard to bring more revenue than previous year but spending money at the same rate.
I post this message as a confirmation of the message I managed to post on the BRD.GB.PL (Nex exchange) LSE message board earlier today. You will see that the trade in question is not currently(7.10pm) on HL or LSE (BRD) lists of trades for today.
The message (not quite verbatum) reads;
This share is one of the AIM most abused shares. Take for instance todays trade at 15.42.12 showing as a sell of 632 shares at trade price of 87p for a total of £549.84. It was my Buy actioned on Hargreaves Lansdown (contract note available). At the time the bid was 86p, ask 90p so the deal price could not have been mistaken as a sell (well below mid point).
I would suggest that many other trades on the NEX exchange for this share are the same for the last 5-7 days showing as sells but many are buys. Relatively heavy buying but share price dropping. Is the share price is being badly manipulated by MMs or traders possibly with the collusion of others incl directors of this company? (end of post).
I have posted it here in case the post gets taken down off BRD.GB.PL.
I have got hard copies of relevant trade details etc of the above. I am looking to try and build a case that needs answering so I would ask as many pi's as possible to check their last buys and sells to see if is correctly recorded not only on their own broker records(eg HL) as a buy or sell but also on BRD and BRD.GB.PL on LSE or indeed any other sources they use.
I accept and have said before about the system of trades identification being flawed almost useless but at least one has a chance with this relatively low traded share to highlight any abuses. With high turnover traded shares like ggp you have got no chance.
I almost see a sea of red on the LSE BRD. GB.PL Nex Exchange over the past couple of weeks and somewhat similar on this board LSE BRD but I believe many of these are Buys from Pi's thinking this share should build.
I may not find answers to questions raised but I may end up knowing more. Who knows?.