Feedback to ???25 May 2023 06:03
Anyone worked out if there are any authorities out there to express concerns / displeasure with either HALO management (especially Cochrane who continuously lied and failed to communicate with investors), the NOMAD (who seemed to walk away for unclear reasons to allow HALO to act autonomously), AIM itself (for clearly not keeping an eye on HALO and letting them drag out their bankruptcy to allow Cochrane to continue to fund his lifestyle), the Administrators (who seemed to have progressed no consequences to Cochrane whatsoever, or recovered any funds to shareholders), or anyone else who one would think should be held responsible for the debacle seemingly engineered by Cochrane to steal shareholder's money? Appears there is little consequences to being either crooked or incompetent in AIM - seems HALO is a poster child (or at least alcoholic delinquent) for the risks of investing on AIM.