Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

SOU CEO responds to investor questions on its projects in Morocco and Italy. Watch here

Share ViewsEp. 20
SOU CEO responds to investor questions on its projects in Morocco and Italy


Igas Energy Share Chat (IGAS)



Share Price: 12.00Bid: 11.75Ask: 12.25Change: 0.25 (+2.13%)Riser - Igas Energy
Spread: 0.50Spread as %: 4.26%Open: 12.25High: 12.25Low: 12.00Yesterday’s Close: 11.75


Share Discussion for Igas Energy


Thread View

Please login or register to post a message on Share Chat.

Posts per page:


BRB1
Posts: 1,204
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.00
RE: Court case
Today 17:54
This says it all,

Cuadrilla made a statement this afternoon:

“Having previously been found in contempt of Court, Ms Rothery has today attended Court and complied with the Court’s order to provide information as to her financial means, thus purging her contempt.

“She could have easily avoided this situation and avoided yet again wasting court time and taxpayers money.

“A barrister attended Court on behalf of the Judgment Creditors (Cuadrilla and the landowners) as the Court required him to do so.

“The outstanding costs were awarded against Ms Rothery in October 2014 for wasting court time by failing to submit a defence after asking for a time extension in order to do so, the debt will remain unpaid and we will not pursue costs whilst she clearly has no assets to make any payment.

“The position will be kept under review and revisited should Ms Rothery’s financial circumstances change.”
 
BRB1
Posts: 1,204
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.00
RE: Court case
Today 17:49
I disagree, it would be so much worse to make made a " martyr of her "
TheThirteen
Posts: 62
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:11.75
RE: Court case
Today 14:38
Not the best PR for Cuadrilla, nor indeed the fracking industry.
digas
Posts: 7
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:11.75
RE: Court case
Today 14:27
Tina is FREE!!! Cuadrilla should be ashamed of themselves!!!
BRB1
Posts: 1,204
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:11.75
Court case
Today 12:39
wordog
Posts: 1,956
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
Wow
Wed 22:56
And to think I once sold these at 120p.

This country needs fracking, especially in light of Brexit, it will happen eventually.
Fishing10
Posts: 10
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.00
RE: Tinker Lane
Wed 21:49
The only costs Cuadrilla got were minor for the seismic array appeal. Don't know how much but maybe as little as £10,000. Planning appeals are not like court cases when the loser automatically has to pay. Planning appeals have much more discretion. After all, the Inspector refused Roseacre Wood appeal which I think is Cuadrilla's prime site, but did not award costs to LCC.
Tony13579
Posts: 2,193
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.00
RE: Tinker Lane
Wed 18:56
The hole point of this us that councils can hire the right legal advice to win more cases first time. And defend appeals so they don't get hit with costs.
BeachHut
Posts: 734
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.00
RE: Tinker Lane
Wed 18:06
Lets hope the Authorities spend the extra money wisely! I have just been reading in professional press that Lancs CC are facing a bill of £300k for fighting the Cuadrilla appeal.
Tony13579
Posts: 2,193
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:12.125
RE: Tinker Lane
Wed 16:25




Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk
FREE Member Services
- Setup a personalised Watchlist and Virtual Portfolio.
- Gain access to LIVE real-time Regulatory News (RNS).
- View more Trades, Directors' Deals, and Broker Ratings.
Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk






Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.